Article Sidebar

Submitted
Apr 29, 2024
Accepted
May 6, 2024
Published
May 7, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 50 Download : 23

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

There are four nahwu postulates agreed upon by the majority of ulama, namely as-sima', al-ijma', al-qiyas, and istishab al-hal. Ibn Mada and Abu Aswad Ad-Du'ali agreed on four components of Qias, namely al-asal, furu', illat, and law. However, this research aims to identify his contribution to the field of nahwi science and identify the contrasting views that occur between Ibn Mada and Abu Aswad Ad-Du'ali in the use of qias in ulus nahwi. The research method used is qualitative with a literature study as a source of data collection. Data analysis techniques include an in-depth analysis of the contributions of Ibn Mada and Abu Aswad Ad-dual in the field of Usul Nahwi and a contrast to the use of Qias Nahwi as law. The result of this research is that in the discourse on Qiyas Nahwi, the perspectives of Ibn Mada and Abu Aswad al-Du'ali present different but complementary approaches. Ibn Mada emphasized structure and precision in applying Qiyas, while Abu Asad al-Du'ali was more inclined towards context and flexibility in using this method. These two approaches enrich our understanding of how Qiyas can be applied effectively in understanding and applying the law.

Keywords

Abu Aswad Ad- Du’ali perspective Ibnu Mada perspective qias nahwi

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Arsyad, Hairuddin, Aji Rizqi Ramadhan, and Asep Sopian. 2024. “DISKURSUS QIYAS NAHWI PERSPEKTIF IBN MADA DAN ABU ASWAD AD- DU’ALI”. El-Tsaqafah : Jurnal Jurusan PBA 23 (1):117-28. https://doi.org/10.20414/tsaqafah.v23i1.10012.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ahmad Faiz Mahbubi Addaraini, Miftahul Huda, U. M. (2022). Kritik Epistemologi Nahwu Imam Sibawaih (750 – 793 M) Berdasarkan Pemikiran Nahwu Modern Tammam Hasan (1918 – 2011 M). Nady Al-Adab: Jurnal Bahasa Arab, 19(200), 48–63. http://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/naa/article/view/23381
  2. Ahmad Zaky. (2020). Ushul Nahwi Sejarah Dan Perkembangannya. WARAQAT?: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 4(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.51590/waraqat.v4i1.69
  3. Aini, Z. (n.d.). Kontribusi Pemikiran Ibnu Jinni Dalam Epistemologi Ilmu Nahwu?: Studi Kitab Al- Khasa ’ Is. https://doi.org/10.24014/af.v22i2.23357
  4. Alapján-, V. (2016). The Value Of Qias In Islam Jurisprudence (2020). In The Value Of Qiyas In Islamic Jurisprudence (2020).
  5. Balkis Aminallah Nurul Mivtakh. (2022). The Origin of The Emergence of Arabic Lexicology And Its Characters / Cikal Bakal Munculnya Leksikologi Arab dan Para Tokoh-Tokohnya. ATHLA?: Journal of Arabic Teaching, Linguistic and Literature, 3(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.22515/athla.v3i1.5139
  6. Batubara, P. (2018). Proses pemberian titik (nuqthah) pada huruf-huruf al-quran oleh Abu Al-Aswad Ad-Du’ali. http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/39079
  7. Choironi, M. (2020). Analogi (Qiyas) Menurut Ahli Bahasa Modern Dan Hasil Ketetapan Lembaga Bahasa Arab Dalam Analogi. Suparyanto Dan Rosad (2015, 5(3), 248–253.
  8. Eka Rizal. (2021). Pemikiran Ibnu Malik tentang Istisyhad dengan Hadis dalam Masalah Nahwu. Studi Arab, 12(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.35891/sa.v12i2.2751
  9. Es-Suyûtî, C. (2006). Al-Iqtira>h fi> us}uli an-nah}wi (p. 17).
  10. Faisol, M. (2011). Pengaruh Pemikiran Ibnu Madha’ Tentang Ushul Al-Nahwi Al-‘Arabi Dalam Memahami Teks Keagamaan. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v4i1.588
  11. Fatoni, A. S. (2019). Studi Pemikiran Abu Ali Al-Farisi Tentang Grammatika Arab (Representasi Tokoh Nahwu Madrasah Baghdad). TAMADDUN: Jurnal Kebudayaan Dan Sastra Islam, 19(1), 84–106. https://doi.org/10.19109/tamaddun.v19i1.3402
  12. Firda, M. I. (2023). Ushul Al-Nahwi Al-Arabi: Analisis Penerapan Qiyas Dari Perspektif Basrah dan Kuffah. Ukazh: Journal of Arabic Studies, 4(2), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.37274/ukazh.v4i2.871
  13. Hairuddin. (2019). Akar Historis Lahirnya Ilmu Nahwu. Al Mah?ra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 5(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.14421/almahara.2019.051-02
  14. Hisyam, R. (2023). ????? ??? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ?????? ???. 3(1), 9–18.
  15. Khilmi Hidayatulloh, M. (2019). Konsep Dan Metode Tafsir Tematik (Studi Komparasi Antara Al-Kumi Dan Mushthofa Muslim). Al-Bayan: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al- Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 3(2), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.15575/al-bayan.v3i2.4116
  16. Latifah Fauziah, I., & Sopian, A. (2023). Kajian Inna?: Dialektika Aliran Basrah dan Kufah dalam Buku Al-Inshâf fî Masâil Al-Khilâf. Ukazh: Journal of Arabic Studies, 4(1), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.37274/ukazh.v4i1.739
  17. Muhyiddin, L. (2013). Konsep Al-Qiyas Ibn Jinny. At-Ta’dib, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v8i1.516
  18. Ni’mah, U. N. (2008). Qiy?s Sebagai Sebuah Metode Dalam Nahwu. Adabiyy?t: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 7(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2008.07103
  19. Pembelajarannya, D. A. N. U. (1995). Abdul Aziz, Muhammad Hasan, ”Al Qiyas fil LLughah al Arabiyah”, Dar al Fikr al Araby: Kairo, 1995, hl,. 09.
  20. Pendidikan, J., Arab, B., Ushul, U., & Nola, J. G. (2023). LISAANUNA Ta ` lim Al-Lughah Al-Arabiyah?: 6(2), 1–5.
  21. Ratnasari, D., & Putra, E. M. (2023). Pengambilan Dalil Dari Al-Qur’an Dalam Ushul Nahwu. AL-MARAJI’: Jurnal Perndidikan Bahasa Arab, 7(1), 10–21.
  22. Rini, R. (2019). Ushul al-Nahwi al-Arabi?: Kajian Tentang Landasan Ilmu Nahwu. Arabiyatuna?: Jurnal Bahasa Arab, 3(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v3i1.773
  23. Susiawati, W. (2018). Ushul Al-Nahwi Dalam Perspektif Ibnu Madha. Arabi?: Journal of Arabic Studies, 2(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.24865/ajas.v2i2.55
  24. Wirakusumah, A. T. (2014). Abu Al-Aswad Ad-Du’ali. 1–28.
  25. ????? ???? ???. (2012). ???? ????? ?????? ??????? ???? ??? (pp. 1–146).