Main Article Content

Abstract

This article aims to explain: (1) the factors that caused students of
the PBA FTK UIN Mataram departemen difficulties in writing Arabic theses,
(2) management of majors in improving the ability to write Arabic-language
thesis students of PBA FTK UIN Mataram departemen. The approach used
in this study was a qualitative approach with a case study design. The data
sources in this study were students majoring in PBA departemen, PBA alumni,
and permanent lecturers majoring in PBA. Data collection techniques used
were interviews, documentation studies and observations while data analysis
was carried out using descriptive-qualitative analysis techniques. The results
of this study are: (1) The causes of students majoring in PBA FTK UIN
Mataram departemen difficulties in writing Arabic theses are (a) input,
many PBA students come from high school or public school with minimal
basic language. (b) the willingness to speak Arabic in students is still low. (c)
department policies are still not firm, namely still giving students the freedom
to write Indonesian theses. (d) department facilities and infrastructure
are still minimal, namely Arabic books or references are still lacking. (2)
Management of majors in improving the ability to write Arabic theses for
students majoring in PBA FTK UIN mataram namely (a) Growing interest
and providing awareness to students. (b) Making policies requires students
to write Arabic language theses and strive for students to communicate in
Arabic, at least when in PBA. (c) Making teaching materials for all subjects in
PBA majors. (d) Implementing the IQF curriculum. (e) Carry out produckbased
practicum activities. (f ) Making guidelines for Arabic thesis writing

Keywords

evaluation, management, thesis Arabic language

Article Details

How to Cite
Nurman, Muhammad. 2019. “Evaluasi Manajemen Jurusan Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menulis Skripsi Berbahasa Arab Mahasiswa Jurusan PBA FTK UIN Mataram”. El-Tsaqafah : Jurnal Jurusan PBA 18 (1):49-65. https://doi.org/10.20414/tsaqafah.v18i1.1005.

References

  1. Abdul Hakim dkk, Faktor-faktor Penyebab Mahasiswa Jurusan sastra Arab jarang
  2. menggunakan Bahasa Arab di SAC JSA FS UM, Dosen di Jurusan Sastra Arab,
  3. Fakultas Sastra Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl. Semarang 5 Malang.
  4. AcepHermawan, 2011. Metodologi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab, Bandung : PT Remaja
  5. Rosdakarya.
  6. Ahmad Fuad Ulyan, 2000 al-Maharat al-Lughawiyah, Mahiyatuha wa tharaiq
  7. tanmiyatuha, Riyadh : Dar al-Muslim, Cetakan kedua).
  8. Ahmad Rusdiana, 2015. Kebijakan Kebijakan Pendidikan:dari Filosofi ke Implementasi,
  9. Cet. I; Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
  10. Ali Imron, 2015. “Kebijakan Pendidikan Indonesia”, dalam Ahmad Rusdiana, Kebijakan
  11. Pendidikan: dari Filosofi ke Implementasi, Cet. I; Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
  12. Ali Mufiz, 1999. Pengantar Administrasi Negara, Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka
  13. Depdikbud.
  14. Burhan Bungin, Analisa Data Penelitian Kualitatif, Pemahaman Filosofis dan Metodologis
  15. Kearah.
  16. Burhan Nurgiyantoro, Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra, Yogyakarta:
  17. BPFE Yogyakarta.
  18. Christine Daymon & Immy Holloway, 2008. Metode-metode Riset Kualitatif dalam
  19. Public Relations & Marketing Communications, penerjemah Cahya Wiratama),
  20. Yokyakarta: Bentang.
  21. Daryanto. 2001. Evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Asdi Mahasatya.
  22. Deddy Mulyana, 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: PT. Remaja
  23. Rosdakarya.
  24. Hasan, Iqbal, 2001. Pokok-pokok Materi Metodologi Penelitian dan Aplikasinya, Jakarta:
  25. Ghalia Indonesia.
  26. Hasibuan, 2015. “Dasar-Dasar Perbankan”, dalam Kompri, Manajemen Pendidikan, Cet.
  27. I; Jakarta: Alfabeta.
  28. Henry Guntur Tarigan, 1994. Menulis Sebagai Suatu Ketrampilan Berbahasa, Jakarta:
  29. Angkasa.
  30. Irawan S, 2000. Metode Penelitian Sosial, Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosita Karya.
  31. Janice M.Morse, 1994. Critical Issues in Qualitatif Research Methods, New Delhi: SAGE
  32. Publication.
  33. Kasmiati, 2008. Problematika Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di STAIN Datokarama Palu
  34. (Telaah Terhadap Mahasiswa Lulusan Sekolah Umum), Tesis UIN Alaudin.
  35. Kees Versteegh, 2004. The Arabic Language. Edinbergh:Edinbergh University Press.
  36. Lexy J, Moleong, 2002 Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung : PT Remaja
  37. Rosdakarya.
  38. M. Abdul Hamid dkk, 2008. Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Pendekatan, Metode, strategi,
  39. Materi dan Media, Malang: UIN Malang Press.
  40. Nurul Zuriah, 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial dan Pendidikan; Teori dan Aplikasi,
  41. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  42. Purwanto, 2002. Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran, Bandung: PT Remaja
  43. Rosdakarya.
  44. Salma Intan, 2003. Problematika Pengajaran Terhadap Siswa MAN I Makassar, Tesis UIN
  45. Alauddin.
  46. Sugiyono, 2005. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
  47. Suharsimi Arikunto, 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Jakarta: Rineka
  48. Cipta.
  49. Sukandarrumidi, 2004. Metodologi Penelitian, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University
  50. Press.
  51. S. Nasution, 1988. Metode Penelitian Naturalistik-Kualitatif, Bandung: TARSITO.
  52. Syafaruddin, 2008. Efektivitas kebijakan pendidikan: Konsep, Strategi, dan Aplikasi
  53. Kebijakan Menuju Organisasi Sekolah Efektif, Cet. I; Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Yatim
  54. Riyanto, 1996. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Tinjauan Dasar, Surabaya SIC.
  55. Yoyon Bahtiar Irianto, 2012. Kebijakan Pembaruan Pendidikan: Konsep, Teori dan
  56. Model, Cet. II; Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.