IMPLEMENTATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE REFORM IN ENHANCING THE WELFARE OF BIMA DISTRICT COMMUNITY: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20414/komunitas.v15i1.9989Keywords:
Community, Opportunities, Public Service, Reform, WelfareAbstract
This study examines the implementation of public service reforms in Bima District with the goal of enhancing community welfare. Utilizing a qualitative and descriptive approach, primary data were gathered through in-depth interviews with local stakeholders, while secondary data were sourced from policy documents and statistical reports. Thematic analysis was employed to categorize findings based on research objectives. Results show positive changes like improved health service accessibility and quality. However, challenges persist in management, service standards compliance, and policy alignment with community needs due to bureaucratic rigidity and lacking leadership. The research concludes that while reforms have benefits, there's substantial room for improvement, particularly in management, transparency, and service delivery innovation. It emphasizes the need for strong commitment across government levels to drive innovation, address infrastructure and human resource barriers, and enhance institutional coordination, thereby directly impacting community welfare in Bima District.
Downloads
References
Aitken, A. (2019). Measuring Welfare Beyond GDP. National Institute Economic Review, 249(1), R3–R16. https://doi.org/10.1177/002795011924900110
Barr, N. (2008). The Economics of the Welfare State F«)tJRiH EDITION.
Berenschot, W. (2018). Incumbent bureaucrats: Why elections undermine civil service reform in Indonesia. Public Administration and Development, 38(4), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1838
Brown, A., Chouldechova, A., Putnam-Hornstein, E., Tobin, A., & Vaithianathan, R. (2019). Toward algorithmic accountability in public services a qualitative study of affected community perspectives on algorithmic decision-making in child welfare services. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300271
Carey, G., Dickinson, H., Malbon, E., & Reeders, D. (2018). The Vexed Question of Market Stewardship in the Public Sector: Examining Equity and the Social Contract through the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme. Social Policy and Administration, 52(1), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12321
Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Røvik, K. A. (2007). Organization Theory and the Public Sector: Instrument, culture and myth. Organization Theory and the Public Sector: Instrument, Culture and Myth, July, 1–191. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203929216
Cinar, E., Simms, C., Trott, P., & Demircioglu, M. A. (2024). Public sector innovation in context: A comparative study of innovation types. Public Management Review, 26(1), 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2080860
Coates, B. E., Shafritz, J. M., Russell, E. W., & Borick, C. P. (n.d.). Prepared by.
Devarajan, S., & Ianchovichina, E. (2018). A Broken Social Contract, Not High Inequality, Led to the Arab Spring. Review of Income and Wealth, 64(October), S5–S25. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12288
Edmiston, D., & Nicholls, A. (2018). Social Impact Bonds: The Role of Private Capital in Outcome-Based Commissioning. Journal of Social Policy, 47(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279417000125
Eriksson, E. M. (2019). Representative co-production: broadening the scope of the public service logic. Public Management Review, 21(2), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1487575
Hammerschmid, G., Van de Walle, S., Andrews, R., & Mostafa, A. M. S. (2019). New Public Management reforms in Europe and their effects: findings from a 20-country top executive survey. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(3), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317751632
Johari, J., Mohd Shamsudin, F., Fee Yean, T., Yahya, K. K., & Adnan, Z. (2019). Job characteristics, employee well-being, and job performance of public sector employees in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2017-0257
Kementerian PANRB. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 25 Tahun 2020 Tentang Road Map Reformasi Bir. Jakarta, 1–77.
Lapuente, V., & Van de Walle, S. (2020). The effects of new public management on the quality of public services. Governance, 33(3), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12502
Mislawaty, S. E., Harahap, R., & Anisyah, S. (2022). Digitalizing Governance in South Sumatera: An Introduction “E-Sumsel” System Reforming Public Service Management. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(3), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.399-411
Moonti, R. Ma. (2019). Regional Autonomy in Realizing Good Governance Roy Marthen Moonti. Substantive Justice, International Jurnal Of Law, 2(1), 43–53.
Powell, M., Gillett, A., & Doherty, B. (2019). Sustainability in social enterprise: hybrid organizing in public services. Public Management Review, 21(2), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1438504
Saxena, D., Badillo-Urquiola, K., Wisniewski, P. J., & Guha, S. (2021). A Framework of High-Stakes Algorithmic Decision-Making for the Public Sector Developed through a Case Study of Child-Welfare. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3476089
Schou, J., & Pors, A. S. (2019). Digital by default? A qualitative study of exclusion in digitalised welfare. Social Policy and Administration, 53(3), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12470
Simangunsong, F., & Hutasoit, I. (2018). Implementing roadmap model ahead Indonesian bureaucratic reform through quick wins method. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 17(6).
Steijn, B., & van der Voet, J. (2019). Relational job characteristics and job satisfaction of public sector employees: When prosocial motivation and red tape collide. Public Administration, 97(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12352
The, E. O. F. (1999). T HE I MPACT OF I NSTITUTIONAL A RRANGEMENTS Table of Contents FACTORS INFLUENCING THE PERFORMANCE OF DECENTRALIZED. September.
Umar, A., Amrin, Madani, M., Farida, U., Yusriadi, Y., Tamsa, H., Bahtiar, Ansar, Yahya, M., Nurnaningsih, Alam, S., Gunawan, H., Darwis, Sahabuddin, C., Jamaluddin, Misbahuddin, Elpisah, Akbar, Z., Sakkir, G., … Misnawati, M. (2019). One-stop service policy as a bureaucratic reform in Indonesia. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 18(2).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Renni Satika, Salahuddin, Kasman, Suraya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
