Survei periodik kepuasan layanan Perpustakaan IPDN kampus NTB tahun 2022
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Users are the subject and at the same time the object of library services, because users feel the most about whether the services they receive are able to meet their needs for the necessary scientific information. Therefore, the level of user satisfaction needs to be measured periodically using various methods, one of which is through surveys. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of user satisfaction for the NTB IPDN Campus for the 2022 period in the form of a User Satisfaction Index. The method used is descriptive qualitative with secondary data sources from searches or literature studies of relevant previous research results for comparison. Study results. The User Satisfaction Index for Library services in 2022 has increased by an average of 4%, when compared to the 2021 period. The highest increase in service elements is the element of service fees/tariffs with a difference of 231 points or an increase of 7%. While the element of service with the smallest difference is found in the element of service procedures by 27 points or 1%. Listening to all the service elements (9 elements), all of them experienced an increase in user satisfaction from the 2021 survey when compared to the 2022 survey results. The conclusion of this study is that the User Satisfaction Index for library services IPDN Campus NTB in 2022 obtained an average value for all service elements of 3.326 or converted with user satisfaction index interval values entered in the performance of service units in the GOOD category
Downloads
Article Details
References
A. S. Moenir. (2010). Manajemen pelayanan umum di Indonesia. Bumi Aksara.
Aryanto, M. Z., & Suratman, B. (2021). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pemustaka Di UPT Perpustakaan Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP), 9(2), Art. 2.
Hanany, N. H., & Sudirman, E. (2019). Kepuasan pemustaka Perpustakaan UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung dan pengaruh word of mouth pemustaka. Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan, 7(1), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkip.v7i1.19130
I Wayan Wijanaraga. (2022a). Data Perpustakaan IPDN Kampus NTB Tahun 2022. Perpustakaan IPDN Kampus NTB. perpustakaanipdnntb@gmail.com
I Wayan Wijanaraga. (2022b). Analisis Pengembangan Koleksi Perpustakaan IPDN Kampus NTB. Media Sains Informasi dan Perpustakaan, 2(2), 49–68.
I Wayan Wijanaraga. (2022c). Komunikasi Efektif di Perpustakaan. Jurnal Literasi Pustakawan IPI NTB, 7(4), 8–14.
Janti Suksmarini, Nurny Syam, Dimas A. Gammayani, Hartono, I. Purwodarsono, Aji Subekti, Ari Wijayanti, Budi Kastowo, Hanafi, Tanwir, Yunita Kurniastuti, & Hendriyanto. (2019). Analisis Kualitas Layanan UPT Perpustakaan Proklamator Bung Karno dengan Metode Libqual +TM Kaitannya dengan Kepuasan Pemustaka. https://press.perpusnas.go.id/files/flipbooks/405/index.html
Kuncoro Galih Pambayun. (2021). Digital Libraries during Covid-19 Pandemic: A Bibliometric Analysis and Information Mapping. Indonesian Journal of Librarianship, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.33701/ijolib.v2i1.1416
Lasa Hs. (1995). Jenis-jenis pelayanan informasi perpustakaan. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Muaidi, M., Wijanaraga, I. W., Mulyadi, M., Wijaya, I. D. M. P., & Arab, A. M. (2021). Index of Library Users Satisfaction at Governance Institute of Home Affairs (IPDN) Nusa Tenggara Barat Campus in 2021. Indonesian Journal of Librarianship, 69–84. https://doi.org/10.33701/ijolib.v2i2.1962
Muh. Muaidi. (2018). Analisis Indeks Kepuasan Pemustaka Terhadap Layanan Perpustakaan IPDN Kampus NTB Tahun 2018 (Penelitian Laporan Hasil Survei Kepuasan Pemustaka Terhadap Layanan Perpustakaan IPDN Kampus NTB Tahun 2018). IPDN Kampus NTB.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1984). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Marketing Science Institute. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=-hVpNgAACAAJ
PermenpanRB No.14/2017.pdf. (t.t.). Diambil 22 Maret 2022, dari https://jdih.menpan.go.id/data_puu/permen%2014%202017.pdf
Perpustakaan Nasional RI. (2019). Laporan Akhir Kajian Kepuasan Pemustaka Layanan Perpusnas. https://press.perpusnas.go.id/ProdukDetail.aspx?id=307
S. Nasution. (2011). Metode Research (Penelitian Ilmiah) (1 ed.). Bumi Aksara.
Sarwono, S., Isbandini, I., & Rahayu, D. (2018). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Pemustaka Terhadap Layanan Electronic Theses ang Dissertations (ETD) Perpustakaan UGM dengan Menggunakan Metode LIBQUAL+TM. Jurnal Libraria, 6(2), 299–330.
Sugiyono. (2019). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Alfabeta.
Suharsimi Arikunto. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Revisi). Rineka Cipta.
Suhartoyo, S. (2019). Implementasi Fungsi Pelayanan Publik dalam Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu (PTSP). Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i1.143-154
Sulistyo Basuki. (1991). Pengantar ilmu perpustakaan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Sumiati, E., & Wijanaraga, I. (2020). HOW DO LIBRARIANS SERVE USERS IN DIGITAL LITERACY ERA? Indonesian Journal of Librarianship, Query date: 2022-06-22 01:39:19. http://ejournal.ipdn.ac.id/IJOLIB/article/view/1109
Suprayogo, I. (2001). Metodologi penelitian sosial-agama. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Usman, H., & Akbar, P. S. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial (Edisi Ketiga). Bumi Aksara.