Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 365 Download : 778

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Pengenalan konsep ilmu kimia dalam suatu pembelajaran dapat terkendala dengan adanya miskonsepsi yang dialami oleh peserta didik, terlebih kimia juga dikenal sebagai suatu subjek kajian yang cukup sulit untuk dipelajari. Tujuan dari kajian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pemahaman mahasiswa berkaitan dengan konsepsi redoks dalam pembelajaran kimia anorganik. Tes diberikan dalam bentuk 15 butir soal three tier multiple choice yang kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif dan kuantitatif. Instrumen tes dinyatakan valid dengan nilai CVR 0,99 dan mean 1,73. Sedangkan nilai reliabilitas instrument diperoleh sebesar 0,80. Hasil tes mengungkap terdapat rerata sebesar 32,50% miskonsepsi dalam memahami konsep redoks saat mempelajari kimia anorganik dengan miskonsepsi tertinggi sebesar 59,38% terdapat dalam memahami peranan air dalam suatu reaksi redoks diikuti oleh miskonsepsi terkait dengan persamaan Nernst sebesar 57,58%. 

Keywords

Miskonsepi Oksidasi Reduksi

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Mubarak, S. (2022). ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI MAHASISWA PADA KONSEP REDUKSI-OKSIDASI: ANALYSIS OF STUDENT’S MISCONCEPTIONS ON THE REDUCTION-OXIDATION CONCEPT. SPIN JURNAL KIMIA & PENDIDIKAN KIMIA, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.20414/spin.v4i2.6260
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adu-Gyamfi, K., Ampiah, J. G., & Agyei, D. D. (2015). High School Chemistry Students’ Alternative Conceptions of H2O, OH-, and H+ in Balancing Redox Reactions. International Journal of Development and Sustainability. 4(6). 744-758.
  2. Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Ampiah, J. G. (2019). Chemistry Students’ Difficulties in Learning Oxidation-Reduction Reactions. Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education. 28(2). 180-200.
  3. Akkuzu, N., & Uyulgan, M. A. (2016). An Epistemological Inquiry into Organic Chemistry Education: Exploration of Undergraduate Students' Conceptual Understanding of Functional Groups. Chemistry Education Research and Practice,.17. 36-57.
  4. Arslan, H. O., Cigdemoglu, C. & Moseley, C. 2012. A Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Pre-Service Teachers’ Misconceptions about Global Warming, Greenhouse Effect, Ozone Layer Depletion, and Acid Rain. International Journal of Science Education. 34(11). 1667–1686.
  5. Barke, H. D., Harsch, G., & Schmid, S. (2011). Essentials of chemical education. Springer Science & Business Media.
  6. Brandriet, A. R., & Bretz, S. L. (2014). Measuring Meta-Ignorance through the Lens of Confidence: Examining Students’ Redox Misconceptions about Oxidation Numbers, Charge, and Electron Transfer. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 15. 729-746. DOI: 10.1039/C4RP00129J
  7. Burrows, N. L., & Mooring, S. R. (2015). Using concept mapping to uncover students' knowledge structures of chemical bonding concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 16(1). 53-66.
  8. Caleon, I., & Subramaniam, R. 2010. Development and Aplication of a Three Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Secondary Student’ Understanding of Wave. International Journal of Science Education. 32(7). 939-961.
  9. Cardellini, L. (2012). Chemistry: why the subject is difficult?. Educación química. 23. 305-310.
  10. Cartrette, D. P., & Mayo, P. M. (2011). Students' understanding of acids/bases in organic chemistry contexts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 12(1). 29-39.
  11. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  12. Dehnad, A., Nasser, H., & Hosseini, A. F. (2014). A comparison between three-and four-option multiple choice questions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 98. 398-403.
  13. Dickmann, T., Opfermann, M., Dammann, E., Lang, M., & Rumann, S. (2019). What you see is what you learn? The role of visual model comprehension for academic success in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 20(4). 804-820.
  14. Dunning D., (2011), The Dunning-Kruger effect: on being ignorant of one's own ignorance, in Olson J. M. and Zanna M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press. 44. 247–296.
  15. Fariyani, Q., Rusilowati, A., & Sugianto. 2015. Pengembangan Four Tier Diagnostic Test untuk Mengungkap Miskonsepsi Fisika Siswa SMA Kelas X. Journal of Innovative Science Education. 4(2). 41-49
  16. Gurel, D, K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L, C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconception in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 11(5). 989-1008.
  17. Hammer, D. 1996. Misconception or P-Prims: How May Alternative Perspective of Cognitive Structure Influence Intructional Perceptions and Intensions? The Journal of The Learning Science. 5(2). 97-127.
  18. Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kellay, E. L. 1999. Misconception and the Certainty Response Index (CRI). Physic Education. 34(5). 294-299.
  19. Kidanemariam, D. A., Atagana, H. I., & Engida, T. (2013). The place of philosophy of chemistry in reducing chemical misconceptions. African Journal of Chemical Education. 3(2). 106-117.
  20. Medeiros, R. K. D. S., Ferreira Júnior, M. A., Torres, G. D. V., Vitor, A. F., Santos, V. E. P., & Barichello, E. (2015). Content validity of an instrument about knowledge on nasogastric intubation. Biosci. j.(Online). 1862-1870.
  21. Mubarak, S., Susilaningsih, E., & Cahyono, E. (2016). Pengembangan tes diagnostik three tier multiple choices untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi peserta didik kelas XI. Journal of Innovative Science. 5(2). 101-110.
  22. Mukmin, M. I., & Fa’ani, A. M. (2019). Identification of students’ misconceptions in proving onto and one-to-one function in abstract algebra using certainty response index. International Journal on Teaching and Learning Mathematics. 2(1). 1-6.
  23. Nurlela., Mawardi., Kurniati, T. (2017). Kajian Miskonsepsi Siswa Melalui Tes Multiple Choice Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI) pada Materi Reaksi Reduksi Oksidasi Kelas X MIPA SMAN 1 Pontianak. Ar-Razi Jurnal Ilmiah. 5(2). 225-238.
  24. Pe?man, H., & Ery?lmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. The Journal of educational research. 103(3). 208-222.
  25. Sadhu, S., Tima, M. T., Cahyani, V. P., Laka, A. F., Annisa, D., & Fahriyah, A. R. (2017). Analysis of acid-base misconceptions using modified certainty of response index (CRI) and diagnostic interview for different student levels cognitive. In International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series. 1(2). 91-100.
  26. Sadhu, S., Ad'hiya, E., & Laksono, E. W. (2019). Exploring and Comparing Content Validity and Assumptions of Modern Theory of an Integrated Assessment: Critical Thinking-Chemical Literacy Studies. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 8(4). 561-572.
  27. Saricayir, H., Ay, S., Comek, A., Canziz, G., & Uce, M. (2016). Determining students’ conceptual understanding level of thermodynamics. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 4(6). 69-79.
  28. Soeharto, S., Csapó, B., Sarimanah, E., Dewi, F. I., & Sabri, T. (2019). A Review of Students’ Common Misconceptions in Science and Their Diagnostic Assessment Tools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 8(2). 247-266.
  29. Suwarto. 2013. Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Dalam Pembelajaran. Yogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  30. Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research (August 10, 2016).
  31. Treagust, D. F., Tan. G., & Chia. 2002. Development and Application of a Two-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Instrumen to Assess High School Student’s Understanding of Inorganic Chemistry Qualitative Analysis. Journal of Reaserch in Science Teaching. 39(4). 283-301.
  32. Tümay, H. (2016). Reconsidering learning difficulties and misconceptions in chemistry: emergence in chemistry and its implications for chemical education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 17(2). 229-245.
  33. Tuysuz, C. 2009. Development of Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrumen and Assess Students Misunderstanding in Chemistry. Scientific Reaserch and Essay. 4(6). 626-631.
  34. Willis, G. B. (2015). Analysis of the cognitive interview in questionnaire design. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.