Main Article Content

Abstract

Kitab Turats Fiqh Fathu al-Qarib is a book in the Syafi'iyyah school of thought which is always studied and taught in the world of Islamic boarding schools. Along with the development of time, this book has always been a reference standard in measuring the fluency and understanding of students in reading kitab turats. So the level of readability of this book is closely related to the level of difficulty encountered when reading the book. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the readability problems contained in this book, especially among students of the class of the Kitab Turats Plus (KTP) program at Thohir Yasin Salaf Modern Islamic Boarding School. This study uses a qualitative method with a case study research design. The research data collection instruments were interviews and documentation with fifteen informants. Meanwhile, in analyzing the data, this study used the Atlas.ti 9.0 application using the thematic analysis method. The results of this study found that students still experienced difficulties in analyzing and applying nahwu and sharf knowledge in the kitab Fathu al-Qarib. In addition, the cause of student's difficulties in reading and understanding the kitab Fathu al-Qarib is that there is still a lack of mastery and memorization of vocabulary and there are still difficulties with fiqh terms, especially those found in the chapter on zakat and the latter is due to the lack of parental support, the difference in cognitive level between one student and another and due to the activities of the Islamic boarding school too dense. Therefore, recording and evaluating any difficulties faced by students in reading kitab turats is highly recommended for teachers so that the goals to be achieved can be efficient and on target.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hadi Saputra, I., Bin Che Omar, M., & Suparmanto, S. (2023). Problematika Keterbacaan Kitab Turats Fiqh Fathu al-Qarib Di Kelas Program Kitab Turats Plus (KTP) Pondok Pesantren Salaf Modern Thohir Yasin. Cordova Journal Language and Culture Studies, 13(1), 14–40. https://doi.org/10.20414/cordova.v13i1.7539

References

  1. Abdul Karim, B. (2020). Strategi Pembelajaran Kitab Kuning Transformasi Penguatan Sistem Subkultur Pondok Pesantren Indonesia (I. Achmad (ed.); 1st ed.). Makassar. LPP UNISMUH MAKASSAR anggota IKAPI.
  2. Albadi, N. M., O’toole, J. M., & Harkins, J. (2017). Reading Difficulty and Language Features in an Arabic Physics Text. In Electronic Journal of Science Education (Vol. 21). Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu
  3. Al-Ghali, A., & Abdul Hamid, A. (2012). Menyusun Buku Ajar Bahasa Arab. Padang. Akademia Permata.
  4. Creswell, J. W. (2021). Research Design Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran (5th ed.). Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.
  5. Fakhrurrozy, M. Imam. (2018). "Nahwu dan shorof perspektif pembelajar bahasa kedua." semnasbama 2http://prosiding.arabum.com/index.php/semnasbama/article/view/186
  6. Haryanto. (2011). Upaya meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Dengan Media Gambar,. Tesis Program Pasca Sarjana. Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
  7. Hermawan, A. (2018). Metodologi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab (Kuswandi. E (ed.); 5 (revisi)). Bandung. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  8. Hidayah, B. (2019). Penigkatan Kemampuan Membaca Kitab Kuning Melalui Pembelajaran Arab Pegon. Murobbi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52431/murobbi.v3i1.194
  9. Ihwan, M. B., Mawardi, S., & Ni’mah, U. (2022). Pengaruh Penguasaan Ilmu Nahwu Dan Sharaf Terhadap Kemampuan Membaca Kitab Fathul Qarib. TADRIS AL-ARABIYAT: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 2(1), 61–77. https://ejournal.iaida.ac.id/index.php/arabiyat/article/view/1422
  10. Izzan, A. (2011). Metodologi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Bandung. Humaniora.
  11. Klare. (1969). The Measurement of Readability. 3rd Ed.Iowa: Iowa States University Press.
  12. Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology. Singapore. Sage Publication.
  13. Limas Dodi. (2013). Metode Pengajaran Nahwu Shorof (Berkaca dari Pengalaman). Tafaqquh: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Keislaman. Vol. 1. Issu.1. http://jurnal.iaibafa.ac.id/index.php/tafaqquh/article/view/7/6
  14. Mariyam, S. (2021). Hubungan Penguasaan Nahwu Sharaf dengan Kemampuan Membaca Kitab Kuning Pesantren Riyadhul Huda. Tatsqifiy: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 2(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.30997/tjpba.v2i1.2828
  15. Muslim, Tim Ristek. (2012). Aplikasi Kamus Arab Indonesia Lite. Ristek Muslim (Kamus Dalam Aplikasi).
  16. Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747
  17. Noh, Ahmad Sabri, et al. (2015). "Ciri-ciri linguistik dalam kebolehbacaan teks berbahasa Arab." Journal of Islamic and Arabic Education 7.1: 23-33.
  18. Nor, M., Ghani, H. A., Fadzli, M., Salasiah, Norashikin, Ruslan, & Yahya. (2021). Kamus Dewan Edisi Keempat (H. Noresah (ed.); 4th ed.). Kuala Lumpur. Mihas Grafik Sdn. Bhd. No. 9, Jalan SR 4/19 Taman Serdang Raya 43300 Seri kembangan Selangor Darul Ehsan.
  19. O’Toole, J. M., & King, R. A. R. (2011). Reading by the numbers: Reconsidering numerical estimates of reading difficulty. International Journal of Learning, 17(10), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/cgp/v17i10/47314
  20. Pendidikan Nasional, K. (2012). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). Jakarta. Balai Pustaka.
  21. Pikulski. (2002). Readability, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  22. Rasikh. (2018). Pembelajaran Kitab Kuning Pada Pondok Pesantren Khusus Al-Halimy Desa Sesela Kabupaten Lombok Barat.( Jurnal Penelitian Keislaman, 14(1), 72-86. https://doi.org/10.20414/jpk.v14i1.492
  23. Rasyidin, A. (2017). Pembelajaran Kitab Kuning Di Pesantren Musthafawiyah, Mandailing Natal. Journal of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Societies, 1(1), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.30821/jcims.v1i1.324
  24. Rathomi, A. (2019). Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Maharah Qira’Ah Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik. Ta’dib: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 558–565. https://doi.org/10.29313/tjpi.v8i1.4315
  25. Rumelhart. (1977). Toward an Interactive Model of Reading. Attention and performance 6: 573-603.
  26. Santoso, A. (2011). Modul Materi Praktikum Mata Kuliah Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Pontianak. Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Pontianak.
  27. Saputra, Iwan Hadi., Bin Che Omar, M., & Suparmanto. (2022). Kafâatu At-Thullabi Bi Qawâidi An-Nahwi Wa-Sharfi Wa’alâqatihâ Liqudrotihim ‘Ala Qirâatil Kutâbi Al-Asfari (At-Turatsi). (El-Tsaqafah: Jurnal Jurusan PBA, 21(1), 15-39. https://doi.org/10.20414/tsaqafah.v21i1.5276
  28. Saputra, Iwan Hadi., Bin Che Omar, M., Suparmanto., & Jihad, Salimul. (2022). Kutub al-Turats Wa Thuruqu Tadrisiha Fi al-Ma’ahid al-Islamiyah Bi Indunisia. Lughatu Ad-Dhat 3(1). https://doi.org/10.37216/lughatuaddhat.v3i1.669
  29. Sidek Harison, Mohd. (2010). Reading Instruction: Theory and Practice. (Bandar Baru Nilai: USIM).
  30. Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Kuantitatif dan R&D (Sutopo (ed.); 2nd ed.). Bandung. Alfabeta.
  31. Tarigan, H. G. (2015). Membaca Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa (Edisi Revi). Bandung. CV Angkasa.
  32. Tisdell, S. B. ., & E.J. (2016). Qualitative Research. Jossey Bass?: A Wiley Brand.
  33. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research Design and Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publication.
  34. Yusuf, A. (2014). Upaya Peningkatan Kemahiran Membaca Kitab Kuning Siswa Pasca Metode Amtsilati Pondok Pesantren Ngalah Sengonagung Periode 2006-2007. Studi Arab: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 5(2), 25–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35891/studi%20arab.v5i2.194
  35. VanWynsberghe, R., & Khan, S. (2007). Redefining Case Study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690700600208