DEMOCRATIC DIALOGUE OR POLITICAL PERFORMANCE? ANALYZING ANIES' URGENCY THROUGH THE LENS OF DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY

Habibur Rohman Habibur Rohman; Rizal Al Hamid

doi:10.20414/politea.v7i1.10017

Authors

Habibur Rohman Habibur Rohman Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Rizal Al Hamid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20414/politea.v7i1.10017

Keywords:

Desak Anies, Deliberative Democracy, Public Participation

Abstract

Desak Anies, as a political initiative led by Governor Anies Baswedan, it is the focus of research within the conceptual framework of deliberative democracy, which emphasizes the importance of broad, independent, and critical public participation in the political decision-making process. Through a descriptive-analytical approach, This study investigates Desak Anies from the perspective of deliberative democracy. Data on public participation and active participation invitations from Anies Baswedan were analyzed to understand the extent to which Desak Anies reflects an independent and critical public space. Even though Desak Anies encouraging public participation, further evaluation is needed to ensure that available public spaces support open discussion, equitable inclusion of different segments of society, and in-depth consideration of diverse views. This research provides in-depth insight into the role of Desak Anies in strengthening the principles of deliberative democracy in the context of contemporary politics. In addition, the study provides a basis for further reflection and improvement in democratic public participation, affirming the importance of strengthening public spaces to support a healthy and inclusive democratic process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. “Penganggaran partisipatif seolah-olah emansipasi penting. Politik & Masyarakat” (2014).

Bryman, A. “Misi tercapai??: Metode penelitian dalam lima tahun pertama Kepemimpinan.” (2011).

Budiman, Ilham Febri. “Peran Pancasila Sebagai Ideologi Negara Dalam Mewujudkan Indonesia Emas 2045” 2, no. 3 (2024): 47–54.

Farihah, Liza, dan Sri Wahyuni. “Demokrasi Deliberatif dalam Proses Pembentukan Undang-Undang di Indonesia: Penerapan dan Tantangan ke Depan Oleh:” 3 (1998).

Haliim, Wimmy. “Demokrasi Deliberatif Indonesia?: Konsep Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Membentuk Demokrasi dan Hukum yang Responsif.” Jurnal Masyarakat Indonesia 42, no. 1 (2016): 19–30.

Hardiman, F. Budi. “Demokrasi Deliberatif: Model untuk Indonesia Pasca- Soeharto?” (2004).

Huntington, SP. “Gelombang ketiga: Demokratisasi pada akhir abad kedua puluh” (1993).

Maspul, Kurniawan Arif. “Reimagining Democracy: An Exploration of Anies Baswedan’s" Desak Anies" Program.” Indonesian Journal of Social Development 1, no. 3 (2024): 13.

Nadhiroh, Fatichatun. “Berdesak-desakan Saat Desak Anies Terakhir yang Digelar di Surabaya.” DetikJatim (2024). https://www.detik.com/jatim/berita/d-7185608/berdesak-desakan-di-desak-anies-terakhir-yang-digelar-di-surabaya.

Norris, P. “Phoenix demokratis: Menemukan kembali aktivisme politik.” (2002).

Nur, Milda, Risma Abdah, Prodi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Fatimah Aqilah Ichtiari, Prodi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Anisara Aulia, Prodi Pendidikan Matematika, dan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. “Proyeksi Penduduk Menuju Indonesia Emas Tahun 2045 Melalui Penerapan Teori Malthus Milda Nur Risma Abdah Fatimah Aqilah Ichtiari dan filsuf Bangsa Jerman tidak setuju dengan Malthus . Karl Marx menyanggah Teori kesempatan kerja kala itu , dan bukan meneka” 2, no. 1 (2024).

Prasetyo, Antonius Galih. “Menuju Demokrasi Rasional: Melacak Pemikiran Jürgen Habermas Tentang Ruang Publik.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik 16, no. 2 (2012): 169–185.

Syalianda, S. I., & Kusumastuti, R. D. “Implementasi konsep smart city: Kasus kota pintar Jakarta, Indonesia” (2021).