Upgrading Students' Engagement in English Online Learning Using the Zoom Platform

Authors

  • Yayu Nopriani Martha STIP Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20414/edulangue.v7i2.12218

Keywords:

students’ engagement, English learning, online learning, cognitive engagement, behavioral engagement, emotional engagement

Abstract

Abstract—The shift to online learning, propelled by the COVID-19 pandemic, has transformed how students engage in education, including English language learning. This paper investigates the factors that influence student engagement in English online learning through the Zoom platform. The study aims to analyze students' cognitive, emotional, and behavioral engagement while using Zoom, exploring both the challenges and opportunities that arise in an online environment. Data for the study were collected through surveys and interviews with English language learners, as well as through observations of online Zoom sessions. The results highlight key factors affecting engagement, such as the role of interactive tools, instructor presence, peer interaction, and technical issues. Recommendations for improving online engagement are also discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s41239-019-0176-8

Chen, T., & Kent, S. (2020). The role of small-group interaction in promoting English language learners’ communication skills in online learning environments. Online Learning Journal, 24(2), 83-102.

Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The Online Student Engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4), n4.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346 543074001059

Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2020). The use of videoconferencing to support language teaching. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 91-104.

Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36-53.

Kim, D., & Lim, C. (2019). The Effects of Scaffolding in Online Learning on Learners’ Cognitive Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 19(2), 27-39

McGaughey, F., Watermeyer, R., Shankar, K., Suri, V. R., Knight, C., Crick, T., ... & Chung, R. (2022). ‘This can’t be the new norm’: academics’ perspectives on the COVID-19 crisis for the Australian university sector. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(7), 2231–2246. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1973384

Park, M., & Son, J. (2020). Exploring the challenges of teaching English online during the pandemic: A focus on videoconferencing tools. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 45(3), 65-78.

Suharti, D. S., Suherdi, D., & Setyarini, S. (2021, April). Exploring students’ learning engagement in EFL online classroom. In Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020) (pp. 139-149). Atlantis Press.

Xie, X., Siau, K., & Nah, F.F.-H. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic—Online education in the new normal and the next normal. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 22(3), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053. 2020.1824884

Downloads

Published

2024-12-23