Exploring the Impact of Persuasion Knowledge and Parasocial Relationships on K-Pop Fans' Consumer Behavior in Indonesia

Authors

  • Khalid Abdul Hakim University of Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Imam Salehudin University of Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20414/jed.v6i3.11803

Keywords:

parasocial relationships, electronic word-of-mouth, persuasion knowledge, purchase intention, k-pop

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores the impact of persuasion knowledge and parasocial relationships (PR) on electronic purchase intention, physical purchase intention, and electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in the context of K-Pop fanbases in Indonesia.
Method: Data were collected through a survey using a questionnaire that measured variables such as persuasion knowledge, parasocial relationships, eWOM, and both electronic and physical purchase intentions. A total of 250 respondents, all of whom are followers of K-pop group fanbases on social media, were selected using purposive sampling. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM).
Result: The findings reveal that PK has a positive effect on E.PI, P.PI, and eWOM, contrary to the initial hypothesis that suggested a negative relationship. Consumers with higher PK tend to make more confident purchase decisions, both online and offline, and are more likely to engage in eWOM. Parasocial relationships also positively influence all three dependent variables, but the moderation effect of PR was generally insignificant, except for the relationship between PK and P.PI, where a negative moderation was observed.
Novelty: This study fills the gap in existing literature by examining how eWOM and persuasion knowledge interact to influence K-Pop product purchases, a relationship that has been largely unexplored in the context of K-Pop fans who possess unique emotional attachments to their idols and products.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allal-Chérif, O., Puertas, R., & Carracedo, P. (2024). Intelligent influencer marketing: How AI-powered virtual influencers outperform human influencers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123113

Aw, E. C.-X., & Labrecque, L. I. (2020). Celebrity endorsement in social media contexts: Understanding the role of parasocial interactions and the need to belong. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(7), 895–908. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2019-3474

Chang, H.-C. H., Pham, B., & Ferrara, E. (2023). Parasocial diffusion: K-pop fandoms help drive COVID-19 public health messaging on social media. Online Social Networks and Media, 37–38, 100267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100267

Cheah, J.-H., Thurasamy, R., Memon, M. A., Chuah, F., & Ting, H. (2020). Multigroup analysis using SmartPLS: Step-by-step guidelines for business research. Asian Journal of Business Research, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.200087

Hwang, K., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Influence of parasocial relationships between digital celebrities and their followers on followers’ purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.029

Ismagilova, E., Slade, E. L., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). The effect of electronic word of mouth communications on intention to buy: A meta-analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(5), 1203–1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09924-y

Lee, J., & Hong, I. B. (2019). Consumer’s electronic word-of-mouth adoption: The trust transfer perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 23(4), 595–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2019.1655207

Liao, J., He, S., Feng, W., & Filieri, R. (2024). “I love it” versus “I recommend it”: The impact of implicit and explicit endorsement styles on electronic word-of-mouth persuasiveness. Journal of Travel Research, 63(4), 779–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231175083

Lou, C., & Kim, H. K. (2019). Fancying the new rich and famous? Explicating the roles of influencer content, credibility, and parental mediation in adolescents’ parasocial relationship, materialism, and purchase intentions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02567

Luo, X., Cheah, J.-H., Hollebeek, L. D., & Lim, X.-J. (2024). Boosting customers’ impulsive buying tendency in live-streaming commerce: The role of customer engagement and deal proneness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 77, 103644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103644

Nofal, R., Bayram, P., Emeagwali, O. L., & Al-Mu’ani, L. (2022). The effect of eWOM source on purchase intention: The moderation role of weak-tie eWOM. Sustainability, 14(16), 9959. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169959

Rahaman, Md. A., Hassan, H. M. K., Asheq, A. Al, & Islam, K. M. A. (2022). The interplay between eWOM information and purchase intention on social media: Through the lens of IAM and TAM theory. PLOS ONE, 17(9), e0272926. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272926

Rahmani, V. (2023). Persuasion knowledge framework: Toward a comprehensive model of consumers’ persuasion knowledge. AMS Review, 13(1–2), 12–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-023-00254-6

Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2020). Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(12), 1617–1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655

Roy, K., Paul, U. K., Tiwari, S., & Mookherjee, A. (2024). Impact of electronic word of mouth (e-WOM) on purchasing decisions: An empirical study. Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2024-0642

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research (pp. 587–632). Springer.

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In Handbook of Market Research (pp. 587–632). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15

Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011

Statista Research Department. (2024, September 26). South Korea’s music industry - statistics & facts.

Tabassum, S., Khwaja, M. G., & Zaman, U. (2020). Can narrative advertisement and eWOM influence generation Z purchase intentions? Information, 11(12), 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11120545

Yang, X. (2022). Consumers’ purchase intentions in social commerce: The role of social psychological distance, perceived value, and perceived cognitive effort. Information Technology & People, 35(8), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-02-2022-0091

Yang, Y., & Ha, L. (2021). Why people use TikTok (Douyin) and how their purchase intentions are affected by social media influencers in China: A uses and gratifications and parasocial relationship perspective. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 21(3), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2021.1995544

Yeh, C.-H., Lin, H.-H., Gau, Y.-L., & Wang, Y.-S. (2022). What drives customers’ purchase behavior in a click-and-mortar retailing context: A value transfer perspective. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(6), 1658–1677. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-10-2019-0344

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-11-30