Accreditation Policy and Internal Quality Assurance: A Study of Private Islamic Religious Universities in Nusa Tenggara

Authors

  • Winengan Winengan Department of Da’wah Management, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia
  • Safwira Guna Putra Department of Islamic Economics, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20414/jed.v7i2.12674

Keywords:

Internal Quality Assurance System, Higher Education Standards, Continuous Quality Improvement

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the implementation of the Internal Quality Assurance System at Private Islamic Religious Universities in the Nusa Tenggara region, specifically focusing on institutions that have not yet attained the minimum required accreditation ratings. Additionally, it seeks to identify the key factors that impede the effectiveness of internal quality assurance initiatives.
Method: This research employs a qualitative field study approach. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis involving participants from six selected institutions, including university leaders and managers of internal quality assurance units. Data analysis was conducted concurrently, utilizing an interactive model work system. The validity of the data was assessed through credibility tests, which were implemented by extending the research duration, enhancing observation persistence, and employing triangulation methods.
Result: The implementation of the internal quality assurance system is currently inadequate and primarily motivated by accreditation requirements rather than by a commitment to continuous quality improvement. Most institutions are deficient in establishing comprehensive quality assurance frameworks, maintaining proper documentation, and fostering a robust quality culture, which can be attributed to limited resources, inadequate planning, and insufficient understanding among leadership. Consequently, many institutions struggle to meet accreditation standards. To enhance their effectiveness, these institutions must fortify their internal quality assurance systems through consistent planning, leadership commitment, and support from their coordinating bodies for private sector universities to ensure sustainable quality in higher education.
Practical Implications for Economic Growth and Development: This study serves as a valuable reference for the development of a more effective quality management system in university governance, aligned with the National Standards of Higher Education and responsive to the evolving demands of society. By implementing sound governance practices, institutions can ensure the delivery of quality education, ultimately producing competent graduates who are well-equipped to meet the needs of the business and industrial sectors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi. (2019). Matriks penilaian laporan evaluasi diri dan laporan kinerja perguruan tinggi vokasi, perguruan tinggi negeri (PTN) badan layanan umum (BLU) (pp. 1–45).

Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi. (2020). Akreditasi perguruan tinggi: Instrumen suplemen konversi peringkat akreditasi (pp. 1–16).

Bakri, M. (2003). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif: Tinjauan teoritis dan praktis. Surabaya: Visipress Offset.

Birowo, M. A. (2004). Metode penelitian komunikasi: Teori dan aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Gitanyali.

Hakim, A. L. (2019). Pengembangan standar pendidikan tinggi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Indonesia Maju berdasarkan kriteria akreditasi 4.0. Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan, 18(2), 43–48.

Hedwig, R., & Polla, G. (2006). Model sistem penjaminan mutu dan proses penerapannya di perguruan tinggi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Junaidah, & Ayu, S. M. (2019). Strategi kerjasama Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri dalam meningkatkan akreditasi prodi. Al-Idarah: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 9(2), 276–289.

Kholis, N., Fajaruddin, S., & Mutrofin, S. (2021). Produktivitas riset Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Indonesia: Analisis kualitatif. Publishing Letters, 1(1), 26–34.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mudie, P., & Pirrie, A. (2006). Services marketing management (3rd ed.). Elsevier Ltd.

Mudlofir, A. (2021). Penyusunan analisis SWOT dalam akreditasi 9 kriteria [Video]. LPM Channel UIN STS Jambi.

Muhadjir, N. (2000). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.

Muhandri, T., & Kadarsiman, D. (2012). Sistem jaminan mutu pada industri pangan. IPB Press.

Nuphus, F. N., Rahamatulloh, A., & Sulastri, H. (2019). Sistem Informasi Akreditasi Perguruan Tinggi (SIAP) untuk pengisian borang standar 3 BAN-PT. Jurnal Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi (JUSTIN), 7(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.26418/justin.v7i2.32506

Sauri, R. S., Hidayat, A. N., & Rostini, D. (2019). Strategi peningkatan mutu pendidikan melalui implementasi Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal (SPMI) di Universitas Islam Nusantara Bandung. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(2), 131–144.

Sugiono. (2005). Memahami metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tenner, A. R., & DeToro, I. J. (1992). Total quality management: Three steps to continuous improvement. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

Widayat, P. (2018). Peran akreditasi dalam menarik minat mahasiswa memilih perguruan tinggi swasta bermutu di Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 4(2), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v4i2.574

Downloads

Published

2025-08-07

Issue

Section

Original Articles