Does Profitability Matter? The Dual Role of ROA and ROE in the ESG–Firm Value Relationship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20414/jed.v7i2.13447Keywords:
Environmental Social and Governance, Profitability, Firm ValueAbstract
Purpose: This study investigates the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and firm value, with profitability—measured by Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE)—serving as the moderating variable.
Method: Data were collected from companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) over five years (2019-2023). Control variables include firm size, firm age, and leverage. This study employs a quantitative approach, utilizing panel data regression on 209 firm-year observations from IDX-listed companies. Tobin’s Q serves as a proxy for firm value, while the ESG score is the independent variable, moderated by profitability.
Result: The findings indicate that ESG performance positively affects firm value in the base model. However, this effect turns negative when profitability is included as a moderator. Notably, the interaction term ESG*ROE has a significant positive effect, suggesting that higher profitability (as reflected by ROE) enhances the positive impact of ESG on firm value. In contrast, ROA does not exhibit a significant moderating effect.
Practical Implications for Economic Growth and Development: This study underscores the importance of integrating sustainability efforts (ESG) with strong financial performance to create long-term value. This insight is crucial for policymakers and investors aiming to promote responsible business practices and sustainable economic development.
Originality/Value: This study examines the moderating role of profitability—specifically ROA and ROE—in the relationship between ESG performance and firm value. By focusing on an emerging market context, this research offers insights on how different dimensions of profitability influence the ESG–firm value nexus.
Downloads
References
Agustin, I. N., Safitri, D., Hesniati, H., Hesniati, H., & Robin, R. (2025). Navigating market volatility: ESG and Islamic stock performance amidst COVID-19 stringency. Etikonomi, 24(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v24i1.38475
Aydo?mu?, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022a). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(S1), S119–S127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.006
Aydo?mu?, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022b). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S119–S127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.006
Bon, S. F., & Hartoko, S. (2022a). The effect of dividend policy, investment decision, leverage, profitability, and firm size on firm value. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 7(3), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.3.1405
Bon, S. F., & Hartoko, S. (2022b). The effect of dividend policy, investment decision, leverage, profitability, and firm size on firm value. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 7(3), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.3.1405
Boulhaga, M., Bouri, A., Elamer, A. A., & Ibrahim, B. A. (2023). Environmental, social and governance ratings and firm performance: The moderating role of internal control quality. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(1), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2343
Butt, M. N., Baig, A. S., & Seyyed, F. J. (2023). Tobin’s Q approximation as a metric of firm performance: An empirical evaluation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 31(3), 532–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2021.1947875
Cheng, R., Hyeongjun, K., & Ryu, D. (2024). ESG performance and firm value in the Chinese market. Investment Analysts Journal, 53(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2023.2218124
Cho, E., & Tsang, A. (2020). Corporate social responsibility, product strategy, and firm value. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 49(2), 272–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12291
D’Amato, V., D’Ecclesia, R., & Levantesi, S. (2024). Firms’ profitability and ESG score: A machine learning approach. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 40(2), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2758
Demiraj, R., Dsouza, S., & Demiraj, E. (2023). ESG scores relationship with firm performance: Panel data evidence from the European tourism industry. Pressacademia. https://doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2023.1674
Ehlers, T., Elsenhuber, U., Jegarasasingam, A., & Jondeau, E. (2024). Deconstructing ESG scores: Investing at the category score level. Journal of Asset Management, 25(3), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-024-00356-1
Hesniati, H., Sonata, V., & Haryanto, H. (2024). Board characteristics and environmental performance: Does ownership moderate the impact? Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, dan Akuntansi), 8(3). https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v8i3.4808
Hu, A., Yuan, X., Fan, S., & Wang, S. (2023). The impact and mechanism of corporate ESG construction on the efficiency of regional green economy: An empirical analysis based on signal transmission theory and stakeholder theory. Sustainability, 15(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713236
Huang, D. Z. X. (2022). Environmental, social and governance factors and assessing firm value: Valuation, signalling and stakeholder perspectives. Accounting and Finance, 62(S1), 1983–2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12849
Jihadi, M., Vilantika, E., Hashemi, S. M., Arifin, Z., Bachtiar, Y., & Sholichah, F. (2021a). The effect of liquidity, leverage, and profitability on firm value: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 423–431. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.0423
Jihadi, M., Vilantika, E., Hashemi, S. M., Arifin, Z., Bachtiar, Y., & Sholichah, F. (2021b). The effect of liquidity, leverage, and profitability on firm value: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 423–431. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.0423
Koundouri, P., Pittis, N., & Plataniotis, A. (2022). The impact of ESG performance on the financial performance of European area companies: An empirical examination. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 15(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022015013
Lambey, R. (2021). The effect of profitability, firm size, equity ownership and firm age on firm value (leverage basis): Evidence from the Indonesian manufacturer companies. Archives of Business Research, 9(1), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.91.9649
Lee, M. T., Raschke, R. L., & Krishen, A. S. (2022). Signaling green! Firm ESG signals in an interconnected environment that promote brand valuation. Journal of Business Research, 138, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.061
Li, D., Olmedo, E. E., Camilleri, M. A., & Keeley, A. R. (2022). ESG metrics and social equity: Investigating commensurability. Frontiers in Sustainability, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.920955
Lim, H., & Rokhim, R. (2020). Factors affecting profitability of pharmaceutical company: An Indonesian evidence. Journal of Economic Studies, 48(5), 981–995. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-01-2020-0021
Livnat, J., Smith, G., Suslava, K., & Tarlie, M. (2021). Board tenure and firm performance. Global Finance Journal, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2020.100535
Mahajan, R., Lim, W. M., Sareen, M., Kumar, S., & Panwar, R. (2023). Stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Research, 166, 114104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114104
Mohammad, W. M. W., & Wasiuzzaman, S. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure, competitive advantage and performance of firms in Malaysia. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100015
Nuzula Agustin, I., Suhendri, N., Wang, A., Bisnis dan Manajemen, F., & Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, J. (2024). ESG performance and Indonesia stock return. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/xxxx.xxx
Okafor, A., Adusei, M., & Adeleye, B. N. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Evidence from U.S. tech firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126078
Pulino, S. C., Ciaburri, M., Magnanelli, B. S., & Nasta, L. (2022). Does ESG disclosure influence firm performance? Sustainability, 14(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137595
Ruan, L., & Liu, H. (2021). Environmental, social, governance activities and firm performance: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020767
Sulistyawati, A. S., & Dwi, R. (2023a). Enhancing firm value: The role of profitability as moderation. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 15(1), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v15i1
Sulistyawati, A. S., & Dwi, R. (2023b). Enhancing firm value: The role of profitability as moderation. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 15(1), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v15i1
Suprapto, Y., Alvina, J., Khesi, & William. (2023). Peran etika, keberlanjutan, dan tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan dalam bisnis internasional. SEIKO: Journal of Management & Business, 6(1), 598–607. https://doi.org/10.37531/sejaman.v6i1.3966
Thanh Nguyen, D., Gia Hoan, T., & Gia Tran, H. (2022). Help or hurt? The impact of ESG on firm performance in S&P 500 non-financial firms. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 16(2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v16i2.7
Wahidahwati, W., & Ardini, L. (2021). Corporate governance and environmental performance: How they affect firm value. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2), 953–962. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no2.0953
Wu, S., Li, X., Du, X., & Li, Z. (2022). The impact of ESG performance on firm value: The moderating role of ownership structure. Sustainability, 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114507
Yuen, M. K., Ngo, T., Le, T. D. Q., & Ho, T. H. (2022). The environment, social and governance (ESG) activities and profitability under COVID-19: Evidence from the global banking sector. Journal of Economics and Development, 24(4), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1108/jed-08-2022-0136
Zumente, I., & Bistrova, J. (2021). ESG importance for long-term shareholder value creation: Literature vs. practice. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020127
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yandi Suprapto, Isnaini Nuzula Agustin, Ayesha Antonia Putri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
