Internationalization of Born-Digital Firms: A Multi-Case Study of Indonesian Tech Unicorns

Authors

  • Novinda Krisna Putri Department of Business Administration, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Douliu City, Taiwan
  • Jenia Nur Soelistyoningrum Department of Business Administration, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei City, Taiwan
  • Eram Shakeel Department of Business Administration, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Douliu City, Taiwan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20414/jed.v7i3.13864

Keywords:

Born Digital Firms, Internationalization, Uppsala Model, Virtual Presence

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the mechanisms through which born-digital firms and technology companies enter international markets, utilizing the theoretical framework of the Uppsala internationalization model.
Method: A qualitative multi-case study methodology was employed, incorporating secondary data sourced from corporate reports, industry news, and academic literature to analyze market entry modes, internationalization process strategies, and motivations for foreign market engagement.
Result: The findings indicate that fintech companies such as Xendit and Kredivo adopt more cautious, regulation-driven strategies, often engaging in strategic partnerships and joint ventures. In contrast, digital firms like Gojek and Traveloka are inclined to pursue rapid and high-commitment internationalization through a combination of virtual presence and subsidiary offices. The study underscores the continued significance of psychic distance, as all firms initially expand into Southeast Asian markets that are geographically and culturally proximate.
Practical Implications for Economic Growth and Development: The findings provide valuable insights for management regarding strategic decision-making in the internationalization process, highlighting the necessity for entry modes to be tailored to sector-specific contexts. The empirical results further demonstrate that successful internationalization requires a dual strategy that integrates virtual presence with localized approaches.
Originality/Value: This study contributes to the existing literature by illustrating how born-digital firms are redefining traditional internationalization pathways, with particular emphasis on the roles of digital infrastructure, regulatory adaptation, and ecosystem integration in their foreign expansion endeavors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Autio, E. (2017). Strategic entrepreneurial internationalization: A normative framework. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(3), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1261

Autio, E., & Zander, I. (2016). Lean internationalization. 76th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (AOM 2016). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2016.81

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). Telecommunication statistics in Indonesia 2021. https://www.bps.go.id/en/publication/2022/09/07/bcc820e694c537ed3ec131b9/telecommunication-statistics-in-indonesia-2021.html

Bhatti, W. A., Vahlne, J. E., Glowik, M., & Larimo, J. A. (2022). The impact of Industry 4.0 on the 2017 version of the Uppsala model. International Business Review, 31(4), 101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.101996

Birkinshaw, J. (2022). Move fast and break things: Reassessing IB research in the light of the digital revolution. Global Strategy Journal, 12(4), 720–737. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1427

Brouthers, K. D., Chen, L., Li, S., & Shaheer, N. (2022). Charting new courses to enter foreign markets: Conceptualization, theoretical framework, and research directions on non-traditional entry modes. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(9), 1595–1626. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00521-x

Calof, J. L., & Viviers, W. (1995). Internationalization behavior of small- and medium-sized South African enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 33(4), 71–79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288034523

Cavusgil, S. T. (1984). Organizational characteristics associated with export activity. Journal of Management Studies, 21(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1984.tb00222.x

Ding, S., McDonald, F., & Wei, Y. (2021). Is internationalization beneficial to innovation? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Management International Review, 61(4), 503–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-021-00451-0

Drori, N., Alessandri, T., Bart, Y., & Herstein, R. (2024). The impact of digitalization on internationalization from an internalization theory lens. Long Range Planning, 57(1), 102395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2023.102395

Du, J., Zhu, S., & Li, W. H. (2023). Innovation through internationalization: A systematic review and research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 40(3), 827–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09814-z

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385

Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2016). Matchmakers: The new economics of multisided platforms. Harvard Business Review Press. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2793021

Fauziah, S., & Kori, B. (2024, November 13). e-Conomy SEA 2024 report: Indonesia’s digital economy to hit $90B GMV in 2024. EVLOGIA Advisory. https://www.evlogiaadvisory.com/2024/11/13/e-conomy-sea-2024-report-indonesias-digital-economy-to-hit-90b-gmv-in-2024/

Gojek. (2024). About Gojek. https://www.gojek.com/en-id/about

Hazarbassanova, D. B. (2016). The value creation logic and the internationalisation of internet firms. Review of International Business and Strategy, 26(3), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-02-2016-0007

Hennart, J. F. (2014). The accidental internationalists: A theory of born globals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12076

Institute for Development of Economics and Finance (INDEF), & Lembaga Demografi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia (LDP). (2019). Indonesia’s inclusive digital economy: Impact across regions, genders and sectors. https://indef.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Report-Preview_-The-Impact-of-Digital-Economy-Study-Google-INDEF-LDP-fin.pdf

J.P. Morgan. (2024). Global e-commerce trends report. https://www.jpmorgan.com/content/dam/jpm/treasury-services/documents/global-e-commerce-trends-report.pdf

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm—A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1990). The mechanism of internationalisation. International Marketing Review, 7(4), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339010137414

Lau, H. F. (1992). Internationalization, internalization, or a new theory for small, low-technology multinational enterprise? European Journal of Marketing, 26(10), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000000648

Mahnke, V., & Venzin, M. (2003). The internationalization process of digital information good providers. In Management International Review (pp. 205–230). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01562-8_7

Mithani, M. A. (2023). Scaling digital and non-digital business models in foreign markets: The case of financial advice industry in the United States. Journal of World Business, 58(4), 101457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2023.101457

Monaghan, S., Tippmann, E., & Coviello, N. (2020). Born digitals: Thoughts on their internationalization and a research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00290-0

Mulia, K. (2019, January 10). Indonesian P2P lending transactions hit $1.4 billion in 2018. KrAsia. https://kr-asia.com/indonesian-p2p-lending-transactions-hit-1-4-billion-in-2018

Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254

Nambisan, S. (2022). Digital innovation and international business. Innovation: Organization & Management, 24(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2020.1834861

Parente, R. C., Geleilate, J. M. G., & Rong, K. (2018). The sharing economy globalization phenomenon: A research agenda. Journal of International Management, 24(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2017.10.001

Pertiwi, W. K., & Nistanto, R. K. (2021, August 27). Kredivo resmi ekspansi layanan ke Vietnam. Kompas.com. https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2021/08/27/13020057/kredivo-resmi-ekspansi-layanan-ke-vietnam

PitchBook Data, Inc. (2024). PitchBook. https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/103397-77

Schu, M., & Morschett, D. (2017). Foreign market selection of online retailers: A path-dependent perspective on influence factors. International Business Review, 26(4), 622–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.01.001

Setboonsarng, C. (2019, July 11). Go-Jek to expand financial services, food delivery in Thailand. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/technology/go-jek-to-expand-financial-services-food-delivery-in-thailand-idUSKCN1U61NC

Shaheer, N. A., & Li, S. (2020). The CAGE around cyberspace? How digital innovations internationalize in a virtual world. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(1), 105892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.08.002

Stallkamp, M., & Schotter, A. P. J. (2021). Platforms without borders? The international strategies of digital platform firms. Global Strategy Journal, 11(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1336

Thomas, M. J., & Araujo, L. (1985). Theories of export behaviour: A critical analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 19(2), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004751

Traveloka. (2024). About us. https://www.traveloka.com/en-en/about-us

Tse, C. H., Yim, C. K. B., Yin, E., Wan, F., & Jiao, H. (2021). R&D activities and innovation performance of MNE subsidiaries: The moderating effects of government support and entry mode. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120603

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2017). World investment report 2017: Investment and the digital economy. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2017_en.pdf

Watanabe, C., Naveed, K., & Neittaanmäki, P. (2016). Co-evolution of three mega-trends nurtures un-captured GDP: Uber’s ride-sharing revolution. Technology in Society, 46, 164–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.06.004

Yang, B., Bai, W., Chen, Y., & Rong, K. (2025). Internationalization of digital firms: A systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 189, 115124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115124

Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary—The new organizing logic of digital innovation. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0322

Zhu, H., & Qian, G. M. (2015). High-tech firms’ international acquisition performance: The influence of host country property rights protection. International Business Review, 24(4), 556–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.10.013

Published

2025-09-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles