Knowledge Management and Performance: Unveiling Creativity’s Role in Higher Education for Sustainable Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20414/jed.v7i2.13950Abstract
Purpose: This study investigates the impact of knowledge management on team member performance, with a focus on the mediating role of team member creativity, within the context of higher education institutions as strategic contributors to sustainable economic development.
Method: This research adopts a quantitative explanatory approach, utilizing a survey methodology that includes 100 respondents, comprising lecturers and educational staff from a university located in Central Java, Indonesia. Data were gathered through a closed-ended Likert scale questionnaire and analyzed employing the Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) method, facilitated by SmartPLS software.
Result: The findings of the study reveal that knowledge management exerts a positive and significant influence on team member performance, both directly and indirectly through team member creativity as a mediating variable. Furthermore, team member creativity has been identified as a critical factor in enhancing the relationship between knowledge management and individual performance.
Practical Implications for Economic Growth and Development: These results provide substantial practical implications, indicating that the implementation of effective knowledge management practices can cultivate a creative, innovative, and productive organizational culture, thereby contributing to knowledge-based economic growth within the higher education sector. This research contributes theoretically by deepening the understanding of creativity as a cognitive mechanism within the Knowledge-Based View framework, while also offering practical insights for institutional leaders to develop policies aimed at enhancing human resource capabilities.
Originality/Value: This study presents an integrative model that explores the mediating role of psychological variables within a theoretical framework pertinent to the reinforcement of knowledge-based organizations in the higher education sector.
Downloads
References
Aldabbas, H., Pinnington, A. H., & Lahrech, A. (2023). Encouraging more creativity in organizations: The importance of employees’ intrinsic motivation and work engagement. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(6), 2337–2358. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-11-2021-3038
Alfawaire, F., & Atan, T. (2021). The effect of strategic human resource and knowledge management on sustainable competitive advantages at Jordanian universities: The mediating role of organizational innovation. Sustainability, 13(15), 8445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158445
Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1), Article 2172929. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929
Argote, L., Lee, S., & Park, J. (2021). Organizational learning processes and outcomes: Major findings and future research directions. Management Science, 67(9), 5399–5429. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3693
Budur, T., Demirer, H., & Rashid, C. A. (2024). The effects of knowledge sharing on innovative behaviours of academicians: Mediating effect of innovative organization culture and quality of work life. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(2), 405–426. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-08-2022-0257
Cao, X., Ali, A., Pitafi, A. H., Khan, A. N., & Waqas, M. (2021). A socio-technical system approach to knowledge creation and team performance: Evidence from China. Information Technology & People, 34(7), 1976–1996. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2019-0536
Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y
Covin, J. G., Rigtering, J. P. C., Hughes, M., Kraus, S., Cheng, C.-F., & Bouncken, R. B. (2020). Individual and team entrepreneurial orientation: Scale development and configurations for success. Journal of Business Research, 112, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.023
Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
Do, H., Budhwar, P., Shipton, H., Nguyen, H.-D., & Nguyen, B. (2022). Building organizational resilience, innovation through resource-based management initiatives, organizational learning and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Research, 141, 808–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.090
Du, J., Chan, L. B., Birnbaum, A., & Lin, X. (2022). Learning within teams: A multilevel analysis of team behavioral integration and creativity. Small Group Research, 53(2), 274–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496421989415
Hansen, M. J., Vaagen, H., & van Oorschot, K. (2020). Team collective intelligence in dynamically complex projects—A shipbuilding case. Project Management Journal, 51(6), 633–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820928695
Hausman, N. (2022). University innovation and local economic growth. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 104(4), 718–735. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01027
Ibarra-Cisneros, M. A., Reyna, J. B. V., & Hernández-Perlines, F. (2023). Interaction between knowledge management, intellectual capital and innovation in higher education institutions. Education and Information Technologies, 28(8), 9685–9708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11563-x
Kono, S., & Sato, M. (2023). The potentials of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research, 54(3), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2022.2066492
Kordab, M., Raudeli?nien?, J., & Meidut?-Kavaliauskien?, I. (2020). Mediating role of knowledge management in the relationship between organizational learning and sustainable organizational performance. Sustainability, 12(23), 10061. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310061
Ledmaoui, A., & Mokhtari, B. (2024). The impact of knowledge management practices on organisational performance: Case study in a public organisation. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649224500588
Li, H., Jin, H., & Chen, T. (2020). Linking proactive personality to creative performance: The role of job crafting and high?involvement work systems. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(1), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.355
Liao, G., Li, M., Li, Y., & Yin, J. (2024). How does knowledge hiding play a role in the relationship between leader–member exchange differentiation and employee creativity? A cross-level model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2023-0046
Lin, Y., Yang, M., Quade, M. J., & Chen, W. (2022). Is the bottom line reached? An exploration of supervisor bottom-line mentality, team performance avoidance goal orientation and team performance. Human Relations, 75(2), 349–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211002917
Litvaj, I., Ponisciakova, O., Stancekova, D., Svobodova, J., & Mrazik, J. (2022). Decision-making procedures and their relation to knowledge management and quality management. Sustainability, 14(1), 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010572
Liu, Y., Keller, R. T., & Bartlett, K. R. (2021). Initiative climate, psychological safety and knowledge sharing as predictors of team creativity: A multilevel study of research and development project teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(3), 498–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12438
López-Cabarcos, M. Á., Srinivasan, S., & Vázquez-Rodríguez, P. (2020). The role of product innovation and customer centricity in transforming tacit and explicit knowledge into profitability. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(5), 1037–1057. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2020-0087
Manzoor, A., Zhang, B., & Ma, H. (2023). Knowledge-oriented leadership in powering team performance and sustainable competitive advantages through innovation: Evidence from higher education institutions. Sustainability, 15(20), 14715. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014715
Miron-Spektor, E., Emich, K. J., Argote, L., & Smith, W. K. (2022). Conceiving opposites together: Cultivating paradoxical frames and epistemic motivation fosters team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 171, 104153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104153
Nakash, M. (2025). From knowledge stock to innovation flow: Strategies for organizational learning and renewal. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-02-2024-0062
Nogueira, A. R., Pugnana, A., Ruggieri, S., Pedreschi, D., & Gama, J. (2022). Methods and tools for causal discovery and causal inference. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 12(2), Article e1449. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1449
Park, N. K., Jang, W., Thomas, E. L., & Smith, J. (2021). How to organize creative and innovative teams: Creative self-efficacy and innovative team performance. Creativity Research Journal, 33(2), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1842010
Rehman, S. U., Bresciani, S., Ashfaq, K., & Alam, G. M. (2022). Intellectual capital, knowledge management and competitive advantage: A resource orchestration perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(7), 1705–1731. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2021-0453
Rehman, U. U., & Iqbal, A. (2020). Nexus of knowledge-oriented leadership, knowledge management, innovation and organizational performance in higher education. Business Process Management Journal, 26(6), 1731–1758. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-07-2019-0274
Rese, A., Kopplin, C. S., & Nielebock, C. (2020). Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and creative performance in coworking spaces. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(9), 2327–2354. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0243
Rumanti, A. A., Rizana, A. F., & Achmad, F. (2023). Exploring the role of organizational creativity and open innovation in enhancing SMEs performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), Article 100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100045
Sahibzada, U. F., Jianfeng, C., Latif, K. F., Shafait, Z., & Sahibzada, H. F. (2022). Interpreting the impact of knowledge management processes on organizational performance in Chinese higher education: Mediating role of knowledge worker productivity. Studies in Higher Education, 47(4), 713–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1793930
Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Zafar, A. U., Rehman, S. U., & Islam, T. (2020). Exploring the influence of knowledge management process on corporate sustainable performance through green innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(9), 2079–2106. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2019-0624
Suparwadi, Musadieq, M. A., Riza, M. F., & Hutahayan, B. (2024). Leveraging intellectual capital and knowledge management to drive innovation and organizational performance. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 16, Article 18479790241304563. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790241304563
Van Hooijdonk, M., Mainhard, T., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2023). Creative problem solving in primary school students. Learning and Instruction, 88, Article 101823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101823
Venkataramani, V., & Tang, C. (2024). When does external knowledge benefit team creativity? The role of internal team network structure and task complexity. Organization Science, 35(1), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1661
Wang, Z., Ren, S., Chadee, D., Liu, M., & Cai, S. (2021). Team reflexivity and employee innovative behavior: The mediating role of knowledge sharing and moderating role of leadership. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(6), 1619–1639. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2020-0683
Weidmann, B., & Deming, D. J. (2021). Team players: How social skills improve team performance. Econometrica, 89(6), 2637–2657. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA18461
Wilms, R., Mäthner, E., Winnen, L., & Lanwehr, R. (2021). Omitted variable bias: A threat to estimating causal relationships. Methods in Psychology, 5, Article 100075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100075
Wu, N., & Liu, Z. (2021). Higher education development, technological innovation and industrial structure upgrade. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, Article 120400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120400
Ye, P., Liu, L., & Tan, J. (2022). Creative leadership, innovation climate and innovation behaviour: The moderating role of knowledge sharing in management. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(4), 1092–1114. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2020-0199
Zhang, X., Chu, Z., Ren, L., & Xing, J. (2023). Open innovation and sustainable competitive advantage: The role of organizational learning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, Article 122114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122114
Zhao, H., Zhang, J., Heng, S., & Qi, C. (2021). Team growth mindset and team scientific creativity of college students: The role of team achievement goal orientation and leader behavioral feedback. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, Article 100957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100957
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rizqa Ula Fahadha, Muhammad Syamsul Maarif, Budi Yulianto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).






