Modelling the nexus between income inequality and shadow economy in Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20414/jed.v4i2.5486Keywords:
shadow economy, income inequality, ARDL, FM-OLS, granger causality, NigeriaAbstract
Purpose — This paper aims to examine the relationship between the shadow economy and income inequality in Nigeria.
Method — The paper employed Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL), Fully Modified Ordinary Least Square (FMOLS), and Granger causality. This methodology is used to avoid endogeneity and heterogeneity in the model. This paper gauged income inequality using two diverse indicators of the Gini coefficient: the Gini index in proportion to household disposable income and the Gini index in proportion to household market income. In accordance with the literature, our empirical analysis draws on data from the Standardized World Income Inequality Database (SWIID), the World Bank, World Development Indicators, and the International Country Risk Guide (ICRG) for Nigeria from 1991 to 2018.
Result — The findings of ARDL and FMOLS suggested a positive relationship between income inequality and the shadow economy, based on both measures of income inequality. In the short term, however, the shadow economy and income inequality are negatively correlated. Furthermore, we discovered a one-way causal relationship exists in Nigeria between the shadow economy, household disposable income, institutional democracy, household market income, and corruption control (CCI).
Recommendation — Shadow economy has been regarded as an avenue to create job opportunities and raise poverty-income levels. It is critical that, for the shadow economy to reduce income inequality in Nigeria, policymakers should develop much better policies aimed at addressing income inequality.
Contribution — In order to understand the relationship between income inequality and shadow economy activities in Nigeria, this study employed three methodologies, namely: Autoregressive Distributed Lags (ARDL), Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS), and Granger Causality. The result offers reliable recommendations for pro-poor interventions that aim to limit the growth of informality via redistributing incomes.
Downloads
References
Adegboyega, S. B., Akinbobola, T. O., and Ajayi, F. O. (2021). Capital Flows and Economic Growth: What Roles Does Trade Liberialisation Play? Izvestiya, 1, 26-44. [link]
Ariyo, A., and Bekoe, W. (2012). Currency demand, the underground economy and tax evasion: The case of Nigeria. Journal of Monetary and Economic Integration, 11(2), 129-157. [link]
Asea, P. K. (1996). The informal sector: baby or bath water? A comment. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 45, 163–171. [link]
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Hegerty, S. W., and Wilmeth, H. (2008). Short-run and long-run determinants of income inequality: evidence from 16 countries. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 30(3), 463-484. [link]
Baklouti, N., and Boujelbene, Y. (2019). Shadow economy, corruption, and economic growth: An empirical analysis. The Review of Black Political Economy, 47(3), 276-294. [link]
Berdiev, A. N., and Saunoris, J. W. (2019). On the relationship between income inequality and the shadow economy. Eastern Economic Journal, 45(2), 224-249. [link]
Bhattacharya, P. C. (2011). Informal sector, income inequality and economic development. Economic Modelling, 28(3), 820-830. [link]
Borlea, S. N., Achim, M. V., and Miron, M. G. (2017). Corruption, shadow economy and economic growth: An empirical survey across the European Union countries. Studia Universitatis Vasile Goldi? Arad, Seria ?tiin?e Economice, 27(2), 19-32. [link]
Buehn, A., and Schneider, F. (2012). Corruption and the shadow economy: like oil and vinegar, like water and fire? International Tax and Public Finance, 19(1), 172-194. [link]
Choi, J. P., and Thum, M. (2005). Corruption and the shadow economy. International Economic Review, 46(3), 817-836. [link]
Chong, A., and Gradstein, M. (2007). Inequality and institutions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3), 454-465. [link]
Clarke, G. R., Xu, L. C., and Zou, H. F. (2006). Finance and income inequality: what do the data tell us? Southern economic journal, 72(3), 578-596. [link]
Dell’Anno, R. (2016a). Analyzing the determinants of the shadow economy with a “separate approach”. An application of the relationship between inequality and the shadow economy. World Development, 84, 342-356. [link]
Dell’Anno, R. (2016b). Inequality and informality in transition and emerging countries. IZA World of Labor, 325. [link]
Doumbia, D., and Kinda, M. T. (2019). Reallocating Public Spending to Reduce Income Inequality: Can It Work? International Monetary Fund. [link]
Dreher, A., Kotsogiannis, C., and McCorriston, S. (2009). How do institutions affect corruption and the shadow economy? International Tax and Public Finance, 16(6), 773-796. [link]
Elgin, C., and Oztunali, O. (2016). Institutions, informal economy, and economic development. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 50(4), 145-162. [link]
Esaku, S. (2021a). Is informality a barrier to economic growth in Uganda? Empirical analysis. Development Studies Research, 8(1), 109-121. [link]
Esaku, S. (2021b). Does the shadow economy increase income inequality in the short-and long-run? Empirical evidence from Uganda. Cogent Economics and Finance, 9(1). [link]
Esaku, S. (2022). Institutionalized democracy and the shadow economy in the short-and long-run: empirical analysis from Uganda. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1-12. [link]
Fawaz, F., Rahnama, M., and Valcarcel, V. J. (2014). A refinement of the relationship between economic growth and income inequality. Applied Economics, 46(27), 3351-3361. [link]
Fourie, F. (2018). Enabling the forgotten sector: Informal-sector realities, policy approaches and formalisation in South Africa. The South African informal sector: Creating jobs, reducing poverty, 439-478. [link]
Goel, R. K., and Nelson, M. A. (2016). Shining a light on the shadows: Identifying robust determinants of the shadow economy. Economic Modelling, 58, 351-364. [link]
Goel, R. K., Saunoris, J. W., and Schneider, F. (2017). Growth in the shadows: effect of the shadow economy on US economic growth over more than a century. Contemporary Economic Policy, 37(1), 50-67. [link]
Guillermo, R.B.C. and Deyvi, A.A. (2018). The informal economy and its impact on tax revenues and economic growth: Analysis of OECD members and Latin America Countries (1995-2016). [link]
Harris, J. R., and Todaro, M. P. (1970). Migration, unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis. The American economic review, 60(1), 126-142. [link]
Huynh, C. M., and Nguyen, T. L. (2020). Shadow economy and income inequality: new empirical evidence from Asian developing countries. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 25(1), 175-192. [link]
International Country Risk Guide (ICRG) Researchers. (2017). Country Risk Guide (ICRG) researchers. [link]
Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., and Zoido-Lobaton, P. (1998). Regulatory discretion and the unofficial economy. The American economic review, 88(2), 387-392. [link]
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1),1-28. [link]
Loayza, N. V. (1996, December). The economics of the informal sector: a simple model and some empirical evidence from Latin America. In Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy (Vol. 45, pp. 129-162). North-Holland. [link]
Lustig, N., Lopez-Calva, L. F., and Ortiz-Juarez, E. (2013). Declining inequality in Latin America in the 2000s: The cases of Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. World Developmentt, 44, 129-141. [link]
Maku, O. E., Ogede, J. S., Adelowokan, O. A., and Oshinowo, B. O. (2021). Exploring the interaction of trade openness, income inequality, and poverty in Nigeria. Journal of Enterprise and Development (JED), 3(2), 113-130. [link]
Medina, L., and Schneider, F. (2019). Shedding light on the shadow economy: A global database and the interaction with the official one. [link]
Menegaki, A. N. (2019). The ARDL method in the energy-growth nexus field; best implementation strategies. Economies, 7(4), 105. [link]
Mishra, A., and Ray, R. (2010). Informality, corruption, and inequality. Bath economics research paper, 13(10). [link]
Mugoda, S., Esaku, S., Nakimu, R. K., and Bbaale, E. (2020). The portrait of Uganda’s informal sector: What main obstacles do the sector face? Cogent Economics and Finance, 8(1), 1843255. [link]
Nguyen, D. V., and Duong, M. T. H. (2021). Shadow economy, corruption and economic growth: an analysis of BRICS countries. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 665-672. [link]
Ogbuabor, J. E., and Malaolu, V. (2013). Size and causes of the informal sector of the Nigerian economy: Evidence from error correction mimic model. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 85-103. [link]
Ogede, J. S. (2020). Deconstructing the Impact of Entrepreneurship on Income Inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa Countries. Economics and Business, 34(1), 273-284. [link]
Pashardes, P., and Polycarpou, A. (2008). Income tax evasion, inequality and poverty. Cyprus Economic Policy Review, 2(2), 37-49. [link]
Pesaran, M. H. and Shin, Y. (1999). An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis. In S. Strom (Ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in 20th Century. The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, Chapter 11. Cambridge University Press. [link]
Pesaran, M. H., and Shin, Y. (1995). Long-run structural modelling. Econometric reviews, 21(1), 49-87. [link]
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., and Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of applied econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. [link]
Rajaram, R. (2012). Poverty, income inequality and economic growth: A spatial analysis for the US counties. The Indian Economic Journal, 60(2), 73-88. [link]
Rosser Jr, J. B., Rosser, M. V., and Ahmed, E. (2000). Income inequality and the informal economy in transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 28(1), 156-171. [link]
Saha, S., Beladi, H., and Kar, S. (2021). Corruption control, shadow economy and income inequality: Evidence from Asia. Economic Systems, 45(2), 100774. [link]
Schneider, F., and Enste, D. (2000). Shadow economics around the world: size, causes, and consequences. Forthcoming in Journal of Economic Literature in March or June. [link]
Seven, U., and Coskun, Y. (2016). Does financial development reduce income inequality and poverty? Evidence from emerging countries. Emerging Markets Review, 26, 34-63. [link]
Shin, Y., Yu, B., and Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt (pp. 281-314). Springer, New York, NY. [link]
Siami-Namini, S., and Hudson, D. (2019). Inflation and income inequality in developed and developing countries. Journal of Economic Studies. [link]
Solt, F. (2020). Measuring income inequality across countries and over time: The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 101(3), 1183-1199. [link]
Tang, T.C. (2010). A reassessment of aggregate import demand function in the ASEAN-5: a cointegration analysis. The International Trade Journal, 18(3), 239-268. [link]
United Nations (2020). World social report. [link]
Wai, W. Y., Tamat, S., Abu, H. S. and Fathin, F. S., (2017). Income inequality and the shadow economy: a nonparametric and semiparametric analysis. Journal of Economic Studies. [link]
Williams, C. C. (2006). The hidden enterprise culture: Entrepreneurship in the underground economy. Edward Elgar Publishing. [link]
Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2010). Bounds test approach to cointegration and causality between nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in India. Energy Policy, 38(1), 52-58. [link]
World Bank. (2019). Impact of Fiscal Policy on Poverty and Inequality in Uganda: Fiscal Incidence Analysis Using the Units 2016/17. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (9051). [link]
World Bank. (2020). World development indicators. World Bank. [link]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Soliu B. Adegboyega, Ibrahim A. Odusanya, Jimoh Sina OGEDE, Felix O. Ajayi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
