Waqf for welfare: A bibliometric analysis of research trends in Scopus-indexed journals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20414/jed.v6i1.9480Keywords:
bibliometrics, research direction, waqf, welfare improvementAbstract
Purpose — This study aims to analyze the map and direction of research development in the field of waqf for welfare improvement in Scopus-indexed publications.
Method — This research employs a quantitative approach. The population for this study consists of articles indexed by Scopus from 2014 to 2023, with a sample size of 77 articles focused on waqf for welfare improvements. The analysis technique applied in this study involves bibliometric analysis, utilizing the VOSviewer application.
Result — The results indicate a rise in the average number of publications per year. The peak productivity in waqf for welfare themes occurred in 2019, with 15 studies identified. In the realm of research on waqf, cash waqf, and Malaysia emerge as the most prevalent themes for welfare improvement. Three clusters were identified: cash waqf for maximizing prosperity in society and economics, the opportunities and threats of cash waqf, and the beneficiaries of waqf, impacting not only individuals but also the state.
Novelty — This study represents the first bibliometric review focusing on the specific theme of waqf for welfare development, aiming to fill gaps in existing research.
Downloads
References
Ariani, M. (2015). Potensi Filantropi Islam Dalam Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis.
Baker, H. K., Pandey, H., Kumar, N., & Haldar, A. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of board diversity: Current status, development, and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.025.
Comerio, N., & Strozzi, F. (2019). Tourism and its economic impact: A literature review using bibliometric tools. Tourism Economics, 25(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816618793762.
Eck, N. . Van, & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. In Measuring Scholarly Impact. Impact. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13.
Hjorland, B. (2013). Facet analysis: The logical approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing and Management, 49(2), 545–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2012.10.001.
Husniyah, P. Z. (2019). Literasi Wakaf pada masyarakat untuk memunculkan minat berwakaf: studi pada Badan Wakaf Indonesia Jawa Timur.
Indonesia, D. A. R. (2005). Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahnya. Jumanatul ‘Ali-Art.
Khusaeri. (2015). Wakaf Produktif. Al-A’raf?: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Dan Filsafat, 12(1), 77.
Liu, Z., Yin, Y., Liu, W., & Dunford, M. (2015). Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 103(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192- 014-1517-y.
Mubarrok, U. ., & Rahmawati, Z. (2020). Analisis Bibliometrik Perkembangan Penelitian Bank Wakaf. Malia, 12(1), 17–28.
Ninglasari, S. . (2021). Mapping the Cash Waqf Literature Based on Web of Science and VOSviewer: A Bibliometric and Visualization. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–11 https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5558/.
Prasetyo, H. (2021). Analisis Bibliometrik Pada Scholarly Journals Proquest Dengan Kata Kunci ‘ Tourism In Indonesia ’ Menggunakan Perangkat Lunak Vosviewer Bibliometric Analysis On Scholarly Journals Proquest With Keywords. Tourism In Indonesia, 12, 16–21.
Purwaningsih, S., & Susilowati, D. (2020). Peran Wakaf Dalam Meningkatkan Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Umat. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 22(2), 191–203.
Realita, T. N., & Anggoro, Y. (2019). Menakar Urgensi Komersialisasi Aset Wakaf Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Nilai Manfaat Aset Wakaf. Seminar Nasional, 37–45.
Rossetto, D. E., Bernardes, R. ., Borini, F. ., & Gattaz, C. . (2018). Structure and evolution of innovation research in the last 60 years: review and future trends in the field of business through the citations and co-citations analysis. Scientometrics, 115(3), 1329–1363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018- 2709-7.
Rusydiana, A. . (2019). Bibliometric Analysis of Scopus-Indexed Waqf Studies. Ekonomi Islam Indonesia, 1(1) http://journals.smartinsight.id/index.php/EII.
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the Scientific Literature?: A New Measure of the Relationship Between Two Documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.4630240406/abstract%5CnD: %5CZotero_Data%5CZotero%5CProfiles%5C1sqw9v0j.default%5Czotero %5Cstorage%5CGCR7NPQA%5Cabstract.html.
Sukmana, R. (2020). Critical assessment of Islamic endowment funds (Waqf) literature: lesson for government and future directions. Heliyon, 6(10), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05074
Tupan, T., & Rachmawati, R. (2018). Analisis Bibliometrik Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan: Publikasi Ilmiah dI Negara-Negara ASEAN. Khizanah Al-Hikmah?: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, Dan Kearsipan, 6.
Wormell, I. (2000). Bibliometric analysis of the Welfare topic. In Scientometrics, 48(2), 203–236. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005696722014.
Xu, X., Chen, X., Jia, F., Brown, S., Gong, Y., & Xu, Y. (2018). Supply chain finance: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.003.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nonie Afrianty, Asnaini Asnaini, Muthi Adilah Bahril
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
