Kultivasi Budaya Pemuda Kubu dalam Hutan-hutan Dharmasraya Sumatera Barat

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jan 24, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20414/sangkep.v3i1.1724
Keywords:
change, culture, forest, living space

Main Article Content

Ahmad Arrozy
Golong Gilig Research Institut Yogyakarta
Nenan Angenani Titis
Universitas Gajah Mada
Fuji Riang Prastowo
Universitas Gajah Mada

Abstract

This study aims to describe changes in the culture of youth Kubu in Dharmasraya Forest, West Sumatra. Bulangan forest was a place of origin and home for the Kubu community. The expansion of the oil palm company againts Bulangan Forest caused the Kubu community to move to Padang Hilalang forest and started to develop shifting cultivation. Nomad tradition (Melangun) began to be replaced because of Kubu community loss forest as living space due to the palm oil industry mechanism. The results of the study showed that there was a change in the forests which were the native habitat of the Kubu community. It made communal compulsion that it was necessary to continue swidden agriculture.  The economic transactions with the other communities are one of the accesses of the Kubu youth to interact with the outside of the forest, but at the same time seize the continuity tradition and the living space the young Kubu. This cultural research uses observational data and grounded theory methods based on the conceptualization of anthropological Kubu pioneered by Gerard Persoon (1989).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Arrozy, A., Titis, N. A., & Prastowo, F. R. (2020). Kultivasi Budaya Pemuda Kubu dalam Hutan-hutan Dharmasraya Sumatera Barat. SANGKéP: Jurnal Kajian Sosial Keagamaan, 3(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.20414/sangkep.v3i1.1724
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): Islam Raja Ampat, Kultivasi Budaya dan Dakwah Virtual di Indonesia
Section
Articles

References

Arsa, D. (2019). “Literasi Awal pada Anak Usia Dini Suku Anak Dalam Dharmasraya “. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. 3:127-136.

Bappeda Kabupaten Dharmasraya. (2011). Peta Rencana Tata Ruang Kabupaten Dharmasraya. Badan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Dharmasraya Sumatera Selatan Republik Indonesia.

Bosko, R. (2006). Hak-hak Masyarakat Adat: Dalam Konteks Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam. Jakarta: Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara & Elsam.

Bryman, A. and Burgess. (1994). Analyzing Qualitative Data. New York: Routledge.

Cobo, J. M. (1986). Study of the Problem of Discrimination Againts Indigeneous Populations. In United Nations Documents. E/CN.4/Sub.2.

Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Szhizophrenia. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.6

Diaw, M. Aseh, T and R. Prabhu. (2009). In Search of Common Ground: Adaptive Collaboration Management in Cameroon. Bogor: CIFOR.

Elvawati, D, Arya. D, Didin. Sumarti, T. (2019). “Dari Karet ke Sawit: Transformasi Struktur Nafkah Rumah Tangga Petani Lokal dan Petani Transmigran di Minangkabau “. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan. 5:86-94.

Geertz, C. (1983). Involusi Pertanian: Proses Perubahan Ekologi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bhratara Aksara.

Glaser, B. and A. Strauss. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.

Huda, M. T., & Khasanah, I. K. (2019). Budaya Sebagai Perekat Hubungan Antara Umat Beragama di Suku Tenger. SANGKéP: Jurnal Kajian Sosial Keagamaan, 2(2), 151-170.

Jayadi, S., Demartoto, A., & Kartono, D. T. (2018). Local Wisdom as the Representation of Social Integration between Religions in Lombok Indonesia. In Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2018). Atlantis Press.

Jeong, H. (2001). “Politics for Global Environmental Governance “. Global Environmental Policies: Institutions and Procedures. London: Palgrave.

Li, T.M. (2000). “Locating Indigeneous Environmental Knowledge in Indonesia”.Indigeneous Environmental Knowledge and Its Transformations: Critical Anthropological Approaches. Roy Ellen, Peter Parkes, Alan Bicker (ed).Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publisher.

Li, T.M. (2001). “Masyarakat Adat, Difference, and The Limits of Recognition in Indonesia’s Forest Zone“. Modern Asian Studies. 3:645-676.

Lombard, D. (2018). Nusa Jawa Silang Budaya 1: Batas-batas Pembaratan. Edisi Kelima. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Marvasti, A. (2004). Qualitative Research in Sociology. London:Sage Publication.

Maykut, P. and R. Morehouse. (1994). Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophic Practical Guide. Washington: The Falmer Press.

Muazaroh, S., & Subaidi, S. (2019). Cultural Capital dan Kharisma Kiai dalam Wacana Partai Politik. SANGKéP: Jurnal Kajian Sosial Keagamaan, 2(2), 185-196.

Neuman, W.L. (2014). Social Research Methods. Essex,UK: Pearson International.

Persoon, G. (1989). “The Kubu and The Outside World (South Sumatra, Indonesia): The Modification of Hunting and Gathering “. Anthropos Journal. 84:507-519.

Prasetijo, A. (2007). “Orang Kubu Mencampok Adat: Etnografi Orang Kubu Dalam Tekanan Dominasi Orang Melayu di Jambi “. Thesis. FISIP Universitas Indonesia.

Prasetijo, A. (2015). Orang Rimba, True Custodian of The Forest: Alternative Strategies and Actions in Social Movement Againts Hegemony. Jakarta: ICSD.

Prastowo, F.R, Faridl. M, Arrozy,A. Anggraini, E. (2019). “Inklusi Sosial dalam Masyarakat Adat: Suku Anak Dalam, Dharmasraya dan Suku Sawang, Belitung“. Golong Gilig Research Team & Program Peduli The Asia Foundation.

Strauss, A. and J. Corbin. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

Syuroh, M. (2011). “Reinterpretasi dari Program Pembinaan ke Pemberdayaan Dalam Pelestarian Ekologi Suku Terasing di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Suku Kubu di Sumatera) “. Bumi Lestari: Journal of Environment. 11:178-189.

Zoa, M. (2009). “Community Forest: Reconciling Customary and Legal Concept”. In Search of Common Ground. Mariteuw Diaw, Tony Aseh, Ravi Prabhu (ed). Bogor: CIFOR.