AKIBAT HUKUM PENCABUTAN LAPORAN TINDAK PIDANA PEMERASAN DAN ANCAMAN PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM DAN HUKUM POSITIF
Main Article Content
Abstract
The withdrawal of a criminal report by the victim in the crime of extortion and threat, which is motivated by consumer financing disputes, gives rise to different legal consequences under positive law and Islamic law. This study aims to analyze the legal consequences of withdrawing a report on the crimes of extortion and threat under Indonesian positive law, analyze its legal consequences from the perspective of Islamic law, and identify points of synchronization between the two legal systems. The research method employed is normative-empirical with statutory, case, and comparative approaches. The case study focuses on the dispute between Yudha Prasetya bin Yahya (reporter) and Budy Widjaja (reported party), which originated from the repossession of a motor vehicle collateral without the presence of the debtor with an arrears of two months (Rp8,020,000), which was subsequently resolved through a peace agreement consisting of joint unit sale (Rp120,000,000), debt repayment (Rp94,000,000), and the return of surplus funds of Rp26,000,000 to the debtor. The findings reveal that under positive law, the withdrawal of the report factually terminates the investigation process through the Issuance of the Investigation Termination Order (SP3) based on the principle of opportunity and Police Regulation No. 8 of 2021 concerning Restorative Justice, yet normatively it does not extinguish the material criminal act because the extortion offense (Article 368 of the Criminal Code) constitutes a general offense that may be revived should new evidence emerge. Under Islamic law, the withdrawal of the report accompanied by a peace agreement (sulh) and restitution eliminates all criminal claims (the annulment of ta'zir sanctions) and civil claims (the obligation of dhaman is deemed fulfilled), since this criminal act predominantly pertains to haqqul 'abdi (individual rights) that may be forgiven ('afwu) and reconciled (sulh) based on Qur'anic verse Surah An-Nisa: 128 and prophetic hadiths concerning peace. Both legal systems demonstrate alignment in respecting family-based dispute resolution and restorative justice, provided that the peace agreement is conducted without coercion, fraud, or error, and restores the victim's rights both materially and immaterially. This study recommends the necessity of harmonizing the provisions of complaint offenses in positive law with the principle of sulh in Islamic law in the renewal of national criminal law, as well as strengthening the collateral repossession protocols by financing companies to prevent such actions from entering the criminal domain.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Al-Ghazali, Imam. Al-Mustashfa Min ’Ilmi Al-Ushul, Jilid II. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1997.
Al-Haitami, Ibnu Hajar. Tuhfatul Muhtaj Fi Syarh Al-Minhaj, Jilid V. Bairut: Dar al-Fikr, 1997.
Al-Juwaini, Imam. Al-Burhan Fi Ushul Al-Fiqh, Jilid II. Doha: Qatar University Press, 1979.
Al-Qurthubi, Imam. Al-Jami’ Li Ahkam Al-Qur’an, Jilid V. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyah, 2006.
Ananda, Gifari Riski, Rini Apriyani, and Orin Gusta Andini. “Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemerasan Dan Pengancaman Bermotif Prostitusi Online Melalui Transaksi Elektronik.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 1 (2025): 12–24.
Asrudin, Asrudin, La Niasa, and Muhammad Tahir. “PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMERASAN DI KOTA KENDARI (Suatu Studi Di Polres Kota Kendari).” Sultra Law Review, 2022, 1849–64.
Asy-Syafi‘i, Al-Imam. Al-Umm. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2002.
Asy-Syaukani. Fathul Qadir, Jilid I. Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifah, 1993.
Cahyani, Ni Luh Ayu Regita, I Nyoman Putu Budlarta, and Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Perusahaan Leasing Terhadap Debitur Wanprestasi.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 2, no. 2 (2021): 254–59.
Gaol, Selamat Lumban. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Oknum Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat (LSM) Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemerasan Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara Nomor 276/Pid. B/2020/PN Jkt. Utr).” MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi, Dan Viktimologi 2, no. 1 (2025): 25–34.
Gunawan, Hendri, Deny Guntara, and Muhamad Abas. “Tinjauan Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemerasan Dengan Ancaman Kekerasan Di Hubungkan Asas Kepastian Hukum (Studi Putusan Nomor 187/Pid. B/2021/Pn. Kwg).” UNES Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 1168–76.
Hakiki, Azizul. “Surat Perintah Penghentian Penyidikan (SP3) Yang Diterbitkan Berdasarkan Perdamaian Antara Tersangka Dan Pelapor Dalam Delik Biasa.” Wacana Paramarta Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 21, no. 1 (2022): 25–34.
Hamzah, Andi. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.
Hanifah, Abu. Al-Mabsuth, Jilid IX. Beirut: Dar Al Ma’rifah, 1989.
Harahap, Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
Herlangga, Dimas. “Sulh Dalam Fikih Jinayah: Basis Teoretis Untuk Restorative Justice Dan Diversi Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan.” Jurnal Edukasi Al-Amanah 1, no. 1 (2025): 1–6.
Herman, R, and Bayu Pramono. “Analisis Yuridis Terkait Implikasi Pelaksanaan Pencabutan Laporan Tindak Pidana Umum Secara Sepihak Oleh Korban.” Jurnal Justice Aswaja 3, no. 2 (2024): 79–86.
Hiariej, Eddy O.S. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2016.
Idris, Muhd Nu’man, and Nawawi Marhaban. “Hudud Dalam Alquran; Historisitas Dan Pengembangan Hukum Islam.” Fathir: Jurnal Studi Islam 1, no. 2 (2024): 212–23.
Lamintang, P.A.F. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indoesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1997.
Leode, Roosdiana Marthina, Roy Marthen Moonti, and Ibrahim Ahmad. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitur Yang Wanprestasi Terhadap Penarikan Objek Kredit Tanpa Persetujuan Debitur.” TERANG: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum 2 (2025): 188–202.
Maghfirah, Aliflanya Arisandy, Diny Arista Risandy, and Nurindah Hilimi. “Sulh’In Islamic Criminal Law as The Form of Restorative Justice: A New Framework in Indonesian Criminal Law.” In Proceedings. Proceeding of Scientific Cooperations 2nd International Conference on Social Sciences of Istambul Turkey. 2nd-3rd of April, 2016.
Moeljatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 2008.
Neesya, Ananda Bunga, Fedya Batara Trisya Sukmana, Suci Aulia, Vega Febriana, and Nandang Kusnadi. “TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP SYARAT KEABSAHAN PERJANJIAN DALAM HUKUM KONTRAK INDONESIA.” Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan 14, no. 9 (2025): 31–40.
Pasaribu, Bangsawan, Ayu Efritadewi, and Piter Boy Situmorang. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Pemerasan Dan Pengancaman Melalui Aplikasi MiChat.” Samudera Hukum 1, no. 1 (2022): 65–76.
Poernomo, Bambang. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1994.
Prabowo, Ageng. “Tinjauan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perampasan Berdasarkan Pasal 368 Kuhp Di Wilayah Hukum Kepolisian Resor Kota Samarinda.” Journal of Law (Jurnal Ilmu Hukum) 6, no. 1 (2021): 172–84.
Prabowo, Muhammad Ibnu. “KEABSAHAN TINDAKAN PENYIDIK YANG MENGHENTIKAN PROSES PENYIDIKAN TERHADAP TERLAPOR YANG SUDAH DITETAPKAN SEBAGAI TERSANGKA SEBAGAIMANA LAPORAN POLISI NOMOR LP/B/1452/III/2023/SPKT POLDA METRO JAYA, TANGGAL 16 MARET 2023.” Paulus Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2025): 191–206.
Pradipta, Rezky Bagas, Winarno Budyatmojo, and Budi Setiyanto. “Menelaah Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali Pada Tindak Pidana Pemerasan Dan Pengancaman Melalui Sistem Elektronik (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Padang Panjang Nomor 15/Pid. B/2015/Pn. Pdp).” Recidive: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan 9, no. 3 (2021): 238–43.
Purba, Rismanto Jayanegara, and Brigita Esther Monica Pane. “Implementasi Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelidikan Dan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana.” Jurnal Sosial Dan Sains 5, no. 5 (2025): 1525–35.
Qudamah, Ibnu. Al-Mughni, Jilid V. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1994.
Rofiq, Ahmad, Pujiyono Pujiyono, and Barda Nawawi Arief. “Eksistensi Tindak Pidana Ta’zir Dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat Indonesia.” Journal of Judicial Review 23, no. 2 (2021): 241–56.
Ropei, Ahmad. “Penerapan Restorative Justice Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Masalah Pidana Berdasarkan Hukum Pidana Islam.” AL-KAINAH: Journal of Islamic Studies 1, no. 2 (2022): 40–83.
Sirait, Amsal Chandra Febrian. “Implementasi Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dan Penggelapan:(Studi Di Polsek Medan Timur).” Judge: Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 07 (2026): 2183–95.
Siti Aisyah, Rismansyah. “TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERJANJIAN DAMAI SEBAGAI DASAR PENCABUTAN PENGADUAN DAN LAPORAN DI KEPOLISIAN PADA PROSES PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA.” Journal Justice 6, no. 1 (2024).
Soesatiyo, Sanca Rossi, R B Sularto, and Rahmi Dwi Sutanti. “PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DI SEMARANG.” Diponegoro Law Journal 14, no. 2 (2025).
Subekti. Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa, 2005.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2021.
Sunardi, Heru. “Penyelesaian Kasus Kdrt Menggunakan Restoratif Justice Perspektif Maqashid Syari’ah (Studi Kasus Di Kepolisian Resort Kota Mataram).” Al-IHKAM Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Jurusan Ahwal Al-Syakhshiyyah Fakultas Syariah IAIN Mataram 14, no. 2 (2022): 201–22.
Suteki, Galang Taufani. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat, Teori Dan Praktik). Depok: PT Radja Grafindo Persada, 2018.
Taimiyah, Ibnu. As-Siyasah Asy-Syar’iyyah. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1998.
———. Majmu’ Al-Fatawa, Jilid XXIX. Riyadh: Dar al-Wafa, 2005.
Tampubolon, Soritua Agung, Ediwarman Ediwarman, Marlina Marlina, and Mahmud Mulyadi. “Penghentian Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berdasarkan Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif.” Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2023, 193–202.
Wijaya, Lalu Indra. “EKSEKUSI JAMINAN FIDUSIA KARENA OVERMACHT (STUDI DI WAHANA OTTOMITRA MULTIARTHA FINANCE MATARAM).” Al-IHKAM Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Jurusan Ahwal Al-Syakhshiyyah Fakultas Syariah IAIN Mataram 13, no. 2 (2021): 89–105.
Yunitasari, Vira. “Pendampingan Bagi Tersangka Tidak Mampu Dalam Penunjukan Suatu Perkara Untuk Meningkatkan Akses Keadilan.” Community: Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat 5, no. 1 (2025): 19–24.