GLOBAL ALGORITHMS, LOCAL CULTURES: Understanding Children’s Content Legibility on Youtube

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Apr 18, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20414/sangkep.v8i1.12400
Keywords:
Affinity Space, Local Culture, Algorithm, Youtube, Children Content

Main Article Content

Tania Annisah
Universitas Brawijaya

Abstract

This study investigates the legibility of children’s content on YouTube, examining how it is presented, created, and consumed within the context of participatory parenting and Youtube algorithm. Using Jürgen Habermas' public sphere framework, the research explores how digital platforms like YouTube shape participatory media practices, particularly in producing accessible and developmentally appropriate content for young audiences. The study adopts a purposive sampling method, by selecting videos based on YouTube’s algorithmic recommendations to simulate the user experience and exploring how the algorithm presents what they deemed as children content. Then, YouTube API is used to provide a broader overview of children’s content trends, while visual content analysis examines the visual and narrative elements that contribute to content legibility. Findings reveal that while YouTube serves as a collaborative affinity space for children’s content, promoting informal learning and interaction, its algorithm-driven and commercialized nature often undermines content authenticity and diversity, raising concerns about its alignment with children’s cognitive and developmental needs. The study underscores the importance of enhancing the legibility of children’s content in Youtube’s affordances to ensure it is engaging, educational, and appropriate for its intended audience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Tolerance and Cultural Dynamics in Indonesia: Religious, Social, and Cultural Transformations
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Sangkép: Jurnal Kajian Sosial Keagamaan).

References

Balanzategui, J. (2021). 'Disturbing' children's YouTube genres and the algorithmic uncanny. New Media & Society, 25(12), 3521–3542. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211049264

Balanzategui, J., & Nansen, B. (2022). Visual tactility: ‘Oddly satisfying’ videos, sensory genres and ambiguities in children’s YouTube. New Media & Society, 28(6), 1602–1622. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221105196

Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Polity Press.

Burroughs, B. (2017). YouTube Kids: The app economy and mobile parenting. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707189

Chaudron, S., Di Gioia, R., & Gemo, M. (2018). Young children (0–8) and digital technology. JRC Research Report, European Union.

Chaudron, S., Di Gioia, R., Gemo, M., & Holloway, D. (2018). Children’s internet use and digital participation. EU Kids Online.

Chen, W., & Adler, J. L. (2019). Assessment of screen exposure in young children, 1997 to 2014. JAMA Pediatrics, 173, 391–393. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5546

Fitria, T. N. (2022). Culture-based animation: Inserting Indonesian local culture in animation series ‘si aa.’ Journal of Language and Literature, 22(2), 362–374.

Gee, J. P. (2005). Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces: From The Age of Mythology to today’s schools. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Language, power and social context (pp. 214-232). Cambridge University Press.

Habermas, J. (1962). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. MIT Press.

Jaakkola, M. (2019). From vernacularized commercialism to kidbait: Toy review videos on YouTube and the problematics of the mash-up genre. Journal of Children and Media, 13(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2019.1693409

Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. MacArthur Foundation.

Knudsen, E. I., Heckman, J. J., Cameron, J. L., & Shonkoff, J. P. (2006). Economic, neurobiological, and behavioral perspectives on building America’s future workforce. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(27), 10155–10162. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600888103

Liu, Q., & Luo, W. (2019). The influence of animation on the social development of preschool children. Educational Innovations and Applications. https://doi.org/10.35745/ecei2019v2.035

Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and the Internet: Great expectations and challenging realities. Polity Press.

Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2017). European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1103–1122.

Metag, J. (2017). The quality and comprehensibility of educational videos: Implications for media impact studies. Frontiers in Communication.

Neuman, S. B. (1995). Literacy in the television age: The myth of the TV effect (2nd ed.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Nicoll, B., & Nansen, B. (2018). Mimetic production in YouTube toy unboxing videos. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118790761

Rozendaal, E., Lapierre, M. A., van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Buijzen, M. (2016). Reconsidering advertising literacy in the digital age: Empowering children to cope with advertising. Journal of Advertising, 45(3), 1-13.

Shoufan, A. (2019). Estimating the cognitive value of YouTube’s educational videos: A learning analytics approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 450–458.

Tarchi, C., Frisullo, E., & Pagani, M. (2021). Investigating the comprehensibility of multimedia educational resources: A systematic review. Media Psychology Review.

Van Dijck, J. (2013). The Culture of Connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.

Wahyudi, J. B., Priyo Utomo, Y., & Danan Priyatmoko. (1992). Teknologi Informasi dan Produksi Citra Bergerak. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2008). Pengantar Teori Komunikasi Analisis dan Aplikasi Edisi 3. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Other source:

Pew Research Center. (2018, November 7). Many turn to YouTube for children’s content, news, how-to lessons. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/11/07/many-turn-to-youtube-for-childrens-content-news-how-to-lessons/