INTEGRATION OF SOCIO-SCIENTIFIC ISSUES IN CHEMISTRY LEARNING OUTCOME TESTS TO MEASURE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION SKILLS

Authors

  • Annida Fadlila Hanan a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:29:"Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta";}
  • Susila Kristianingrum Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20414/spin.v6i2.10179

Keywords:

Acid-base material, Scientific explanation skills, Socio-scientific issues, Test development

Abstract

Socio-scientific issues (SSI) are controversial issues related to socio-science. SSI can be integrated into chemistry learning outcome tests to measure students’ scientific explanation skills. This research aimed to develop a socio-scientific issues based test to measure the scientific explanation skills of high school students in acid-base material. The development model used is an exploratory mixed method. Qualitative data were collected through needs analysis, literature studies for references for initial test development, expert feasibility test, and usability feasibility test (qualitative) to obtain input from experts and reviewers. The results of the quantitative test showed that the test developed has an ideal percentage of 87% (Very Good) according to the reviewer and 71% (Good) according to the students. The number of valid items based on the item fit test was 15. A total of 10 questions have the discrimination category very good, 3 questions were good, 1 question was fair, and 1 question was not able to discriminate. The difficulty level test revealed that 26,67% of the questions were very difficult, 26,67% of the questions were difficult, 33,33% of the questions were easy, and 13,33% of the questions were very easy. The Cronbach Alpha reliability value of the test was 0.77, categorized as good.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agnia, A. N., Permanasari, A., & Hernani, H. (2021). Uji Kelayakan Modul Asam-Basa Berbasis Socioscientific Issues dan Berorientasi Literasi Sains. Jurnal Riset dan Praktik Pendidikan Kimia. 9(1). 1-8.

Alagumalai, S., Curtis, D. D., & Hungi, N. (2005). Applied Rasch Measurement: A Book of Exemplars. Dordrecht: Springer.

Azwar, S. (2011). Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Cahyarini, A., Rahayu, S., & Yahmin, Y. (2016). The Effect of 5E Learning Cycle Instructional Model Using Socioscientific Issues (SSI) Learning Context on Students’ Critical Thinking. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 5(2). 222-229.

Fasce, A., & Picó, A. (2019). Science as a Vaccine: The Relation Between Scientific Literacy and Unwarranted Beliefs. Science & Education. 28(7). 109-125.

Howell, E. L., & Brossard, D. (2021, April). (Mis)informed About What? What it Means to be a Science-Literate Citizen in a Digital World. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Gainesville.

McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific Explanations: Characterizing and Evaluating the Effects of Teachers' Instructional Practices on Student Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. 45(1). 53-78.

Mubarak, S., Susilaningsih, E., & Cahyono, E. (2016). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Three Tier Multiple Choice Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Kelas XI. Journal of Innovative Science. 5(2). 101-110.

Mukhadis, A. (2013). Sosok Manusia Indonesia Unggul dan Berkarakter dalam Bidang Teknologi sebagai Tuntutan Hidup di Era Globalisasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter. 4(2). 115-136.

[NRC]. National Research Council. (2011). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington DC: The National Academic Press.

[OECD]. Organisation for Economic Operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 Results: Combined Executive Summaries. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Pinzino, D. W. (2012). Socioscientific Issues: A Path towards Advanced Scientific Literacy and Improved Conceptual Understanding of Socially Controversial Scientific Theories. (Tesis). University of South Florida, Tampa.

Rahayu, S. (2019, Juni). Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) in Chemistry Education: Enhancing Both Students’ Chemical Literacy & Transferable Skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1227, No. 1, p. 012008). Jawa Timur.

Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues: A Critical Review of Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. 41(5). 513-536.

Sadler, T. D. (Ed.). (2011). Socio-Scientific Issues in the Classroom: Teaching, Learning and Research (Vol. 39). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

Sumintono, B. & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assessment Pendidikan. Cimahi: Trim Komunikata.

Wijaya, E. Y., Sudjimat, D. A., Nyoto, A., & Malang, U. N. (2016, September). Transformasi Pendidikan Abad 21 sebagai Tuntutan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia di Era Global. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika I. Malang.

World Economic Forum. (2015). New Vision for Education. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-20

How to Cite

Hanan, A. F., & Dra. Susila Kristianingrum, M.Si. (2024). INTEGRATION OF SOCIO-SCIENTIFIC ISSUES IN CHEMISTRY LEARNING OUTCOME TESTS TO MEASURE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION SKILLS. SPIN JURNAL KIMIA & PENDIDIKAN KIMIA, 6(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.20414/spin.v6i2.10179

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): July - December 2024

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 SPIN JURNAL KIMIA & PENDIDIKAN KIMIA

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
  2. The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License