Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The phenomenon of visual branding in advertising is increasingly important because it affects the image and acceptance of politician officials, especially among millennials and Gen Z who are apathetic to politics. The use of local elements such as the Mandalika Circuit in advertisements by political officials is aimed at attracting young voters, but it is often less authentic and creates negative perceptions of politicians and promoted events. The research is important because of the gap between politicians' expectations of attracting young voters and the reality of their acceptance of ads that use certain branding elements. This study aims to determine the representation and acceptance of Millennials and gen Z people towards Mandalika circuit promotional advertisements involving visuals of officials or politicians. This research uses qualitative method with reception analysis theory owned by Stuart Hall. This study used focus group discussion (FGD) with 10 informants who saw advertisements and belonged to the Millennial and Z generations, using the purposive sampling method. Roland Barthes' semiotic analysis was used to determine the representation of advertisements, and compared with audience acceptance based on the results of focus group discussion (FGD) which was classified to obtain results using three hypothetical positions proposed by Stuart Hall.


The conclusion of this study shows that the use of visuals of politicians' faces in promotional advertisements tends to be rejected by Millennials and Gen Z, who emphasize the separation between politics and sports. Millennials are generally skeptical of politicization in promotion, while Gen Z is more firmly opposed to politicization and demands integrity and ethics in political campaigns.

Keywords

reception analysis Roland Barthes semiotics advertising mandalika circuit politician officials

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Arifin, I. K., Prasetyo, B. D., & Oktaviani, F. H. (2024). STUDY OF AUDIENCE ACCEPTANCE OF MANDALIKA CIRCUIT EVENT PROMOTIONAL ADVERTISEMENTS INVOLVING VISUAL POLITICIANS IN LOMBOK . SANGKéP: Jurnal Kajian Sosial Keagamaan, 7(1), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.20414/sangkep.v7i1.10230
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. ? Books
  2. Kriyantono, R. (2020). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi. Jakarta: Kencana.
  3. Kriyantono, R. (2006). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi. Jakarta: Kencana.
  4. Sukmadinata, N. S. (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  5. Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  6. Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (2013). Analyzing Social Settings. Belmont: Wadsworth.
  7. Bungin, B. (2005). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
  8. Baran, S. J., & Davis, D. K. (2010). Mass Communication Theory: Foundations, Ferment, and Future. Boston: Wadsworth.
  9. Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Nursalam. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Ilmu Keperawatan. Jakarta: Salemba Medika.
  11. Notoatmojo, S. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  12. Airey, D. (2010). Logo Design Love: A Guide to Creating Iconic Brand Identities. Peachpit Press.
  13. Sobur, A. (2003). Semiotika Komunikasi. PT Remaja Rosdakarya
  14. ? Journal
  15. Retnowati, P. (2018). Agama, Konflik dan Integrasi Sosial Refleksi Kehidupan Beragama di Indonesia: Belajar dari Komunitas Situbondo Membangun Integrasi Pasca Konflik. SANGKéP: Jurnal Kajian Sosial Keagamaan, 1(1), 1-28.
  16. Setiawan, E. (2019). Interpretasi Paham Radikalisme Pascabom di Surabaya dalam Perspektif Historis. SANGKéP: Jurnal Kajian Sosial Keagamaan, 2(2), 119-138.
  17. Rahmawati, R., & Jayadi, S. (2019). Analisis Kasus Pada Usaha Kecil Dan Menengah Ms Collection Kerajinan Kain Perca Di Kelurahan Gandekan Kecamatan Jebres Kota Surakarta. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, 8 (1). 26-37
  18. Pich, C., Armannsdottir, G., Dean, D., Spry, L., & Jain, V. (2019). Problematizing the presentation and reception of political brands: The strategic and operational nature of the political Brand alignment model. European Journal of Marketing, Vol. .54 No.1, pp. 190-211.
  19. Singh, S. (2016). Colour preferences and their relationship with personality traits among young adults. HUMAN: International Journal of Humanities, 3(1), 23.
  20. Serazio, M. (2015). Branding politics: Emotion, authenticity, and the marketing culture of American political communication. Journal of Consumer Culture, SAGE, 4-12.
  21. Thompson, C., Rindfleisch, A., & Arsel, Z. (2006). Emotional branding and the strategic value of the Doppelganger strategic brand. Journal of Marketing 70(1) - SAGE, 53.
  22. ? Proceding
  23. Idroos, I. (2023). Demografi Pemilih pada Pemilu 2024. Jakarta: Pusat Data dan Informasi.