EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DENGAN PENDEKATAN CTL TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DAN ASPEK AFEKTIF SISWA DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL SISWA

Authors

  • Habib Ratu Perwira Negara UNS Surakarta, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
  • Tri Atmojo K Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Imam Sujadi Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v14i2.26

Keywords:

affective aspect, learning achievement, spatial ability, approach, Jigsaw, CTL, Afektif, Hasil Belajar, Kemampuan Spasial, Pembelajaran Kontekstual

Abstract

The current research intends to find out the different effect of the Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model with CTL approach, the Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model without CTL approach, and the direct learning model towards students mathematics learning achievement and affective aspect regarding student spatial ability which is categorized into high, medium and low. The research was quasi experimental. The results of the research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves the same achievement as the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type. (2) The cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach results a better affective effect than the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model. (3) Students with the high spatial ability had better achievement than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had better achievement than students with the low spatial ability. (4) Students with the high spatial ability had better affective aspect than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had the same affective aspect as students with the the low spatial ability. More findings are elaborated further on the discussion and conclusion part of the current report.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdussakir dan Nur Laili Achadiyah. 2009. Pembelajaran Keliling dan Luas Lingkaran dengan Strategi React Pada Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri Kota Mojokerto. Prosiding dalam Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY, ISBN :978-979-16352-3-2, pp 388-401.

Arie Wahyuni. 2012. Eksperimentasi Model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dengan Pendekatan Matematika Berjenjang Ditinjau dari Minat Belajar Siswa SMP Negeri Kota Semarang. Tesis. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Budiyono. 2013. Statistika Untuk Penelitian Edisi Ke-2. Surakarta: UNS Press.

Berns, R. G. dan Erickson, P. M. 2001. Contextual Teaching and Learning: Preparing Students for the New Economy. The Highlight Zone Research. No. 5, pp 1-8.

Clements, D.H. dan Battista, M.T. 1992. Geometry and Spatial Reasonning. Dalam Grouws, D.A. (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. New York: MacMillan Publisher Company, pp 420-464.

Farah Umami. 2013. Eksperimentasi Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dengan Pendekatan Kontekstual Berbasis Lesson Study Pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Lengkung Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Siswa Kelas IX MTs Negeri Kabupaten Madiun Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. Tesis. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Fuys, D., Geddes, D., dan Tischer, R. 1988. The Van Hiele Model of Thinking in Geometry Among Adolescents. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph No. 3. Reston: NCTM.

Guay, R. B. dan McDaniel, E. D. 1977. The Relation Between Mathematics Achievement and Spasial Abilities Among Elementary School Chidren. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education. Vol. 8. No. 3, pp 163-240.

Harmony, J. dan Theis, R. 2012. Pengaruh Kemampuan Spasial terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 9 Kota Jambi. Edumatica. Vol. 2. No. 1, pp 11-19.

Kokom Komalasari. 2010. Pembelajaran Kontekstual: Konsep dan Aplikasi. Refika Aditama. Bandung.

Lim, S. Y. dan Chapman, E. 2013. Identifying Affective Domains That Correlate and Predict Mathematics Performance in High-Performing Students in Singapore. Educational Psychology.

Nana Sudjana. 2008. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nurty Gofita Sari. 2013. Aspek Afektif Taksonomi Bloom pada Pembelajaran Matematika Siswa Kelas VI Sekolah Dasar Se-Kecamatan Alian. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. ISSN 237-441. Vol. 1. No. 1, pp 20-27.

Rencher, A. C. 2002. Methods of Multivariate Analysis. Kanada: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Rosa Rosdiana Retno Handayani. 2013. Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Numbered Heads Together dan Jigsaw dengan Pendekatan Kontekstual Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Majemuk Siswa SMP Negeri Kota Madiun. Tesis. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Siti Marliah Tambunan. 2006. Hubungan Antara Kemampuan Spasial dengan Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Makara, Sosial Humaniora. Vol. 9. No. 1, pp 27-32.

Somerset, A. 1996. Strengthening Quality in Indonesia’s Junior Secondary Schools: An Overview of Issues and Initiatives. Jakarta: MOEC.

Sukanti. 2011. Penilaian Afektif Dalam Pembelajaran Akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia. Vol. 9. No. 1, pp 74-82.

Sutama, Haryoto dan Sabar Narimo. 2013. Contextual Math Learning Based on Lesson Study Can Increase Study Communication. International Journal of Education. Vol. 5. No. 4, pp 48-60.

Turgut, M. dan S. Yilmaz. 2012. Relationship Among Preservice Primary Mathematics Teacher’ Gender, Academic Success and Spatial Ability. International Journal of Instruction. Vol. 5. No. 2, pp 5-20.

Unal, H., Jakubowski, E. dan Corey, D. 2009. Differences in Learning Geometry among High and Low Spatial Ability Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. Vol. 40. No. 8, pp 997-1012.

Wasis. 2006. Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) dalam Pembelajaran Sains-Fisika. Cakkrawala Pendidikan. Vol. 25. No.1, pp 388-401.

Westera, W. 2011. On the Changing Nature of Learning Context: Anticipating the Virtual Extensions of the World. Educational Technology & Society. Vol. 14. No. 2, pp 201-212.

Zakaria, E. dan Iksan, Z. 2007. Promoting Cooperative Learning in Science and Mathematics Education: A Malaysian Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. Vol. 3. No. 1, pp 35-39.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-22