THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GO-LAB BASED INQUIRY LEARNING SPACE (ILS) AS MEDIA ON SCIENCE SUBJECT FOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL IN INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v22i1.11367Keywords:
Go-Labs, Inquiry Learning Space, Learning Media , Science Concept and LiteracyAbstract
A PISA survey in 2018 showed that Indonesian students underperformed in science results. Consequently, the rate of scientific concepts and literacy is low, especially in junior high school grades. However, Inquiry-based learning can be used to improve science concepts and literacy. One of the science tools to improve students’ science concepts and literacy-based inquiry is Go-Labs. The Go-Lab provides students with an Inquiry Learning Space feature. This investigation aims to find out the effectiveness of the Go-Lab-based Inquiry Learning Space (ILS) as a medium for teaching science subjects to junior high school students in Indonesia. This systematic literature method was used to provide evidence from 21 of the literature related to Go-Lab and science literacy. This provided an overview of current knowledge of the Go-Lab's effectiveness on students’ science concepts and literacy. The result is the Go-Lab can be used as an alternative media for teachers in science teaching to assist students in improving their ability in science. Go-Lab can benefit students by improving their ability in scientific concepts and improve their scientific literacy. This is because the Go-Lab is embedded with an Inquiry-based learning approach, the effectiveness of Inquiry Learning Space (ILS) in Go-Lab, and the Go-Lab’s ecosystem supports the science teaching process. The implication of this investigation is to provide alternative mediums in science teaching to engage students with scientific concepts. Hence, the Go-Lab can be used as an alternative media for teachers in science teaching to assist students in improving their ability in science.
Downloads
References
Afriani, T., & Agustin, R. R. (2019). The effect of guided inquiry laboratory activity with video embedded on students' understanding and motivation in learning light and optics. Journal of Science Learning, 2(4), 79-84. DOI: 10.17509/jsl.v2i3.15144.
Andriani, S., Sukarmin., &Masykuri, M.&. (2021). Development of Electronic Modules (E-Modules) Based on Guided Inquiry on Temperature and Heat Materials to Improve Students’ Science Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(Special Issue), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.1234.
Bettany-Saltikov, J & McSherry, R. (2012). How to do a Systematic Literature Review in Nursing – A Step-by-Step Guide. McGraw-Hill Education.
Creagh, C., & Parlevliet, D. (2014). Enhancing student engagement in physics using inquiry oriented learning activities. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(1), 43–56. https://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/e print/22645
Febriani, S.,Taufik,M., Verawati,N. N. S. P. (2019). Pengaruh model guided discovery learning dengan metode eksperimen terhadap hasil belajar fisika peserta didik MAN 1 Mataram ditinjau dari gaya belajar VAK [The effect of the guided discovery learning model with the experimental method on the physics learning outcomes of Mataram MAN 1 students in terms of the VAK learning style]. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 5(1), 82-90. http://10.0.114.119/jpft.v5i1.872
de Jong, T., Gillet, D., Rodri?guez-Triana, M. J., Hovardas, T., Dikke, D., Doran, R., Dziabenko, O., Koslowsky, J., Korventausta, M., Law, E., Pedaste, M., Tasiopoulou, E., Vidal, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2021). Understanding teacher design practices for digital inquiry–based science learning: the case of Go-Lab. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 417–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09904-z
de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305-308. doi:10.1126/science.1230579
de Jong, T., Sotiriou, S., & Gillet, D. (2014). Innovations in STEM education: the Go-Lab federation of online labs. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.2174
Fang, S.-C., Hsu, Y.-S., Chang, H.-Y., Chang, W.-H., Wu, H.-K., & Chen, C.-M. (2016). Investigating the effects of structured and guided inquiry on students’ development of conceptual knowledge and inquiry abilities: a case study in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 1945–1971. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1220688
Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A. S., & Nicolich, M. (2014). Developing a measure of scientific literacy for middle school students. Science Education, 98(4), 549-580. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21115
Gillet, D., de Jong, T., Sotirou, S., & Salzman, C.(2013,March 13-March 15). Personalised Learning Spaces and Federated Online Labs for STEM Education at School.[Paper Presentation]. 2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).Technische Universita?t Berlin, Berlin, Germany. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530194.
Grabau, L.J., & Ma, X.(2017). Science engagement and science achievement in the context of science instruction: a multilevel analysis of U.S. students and schools. International Journal of Science Education, 39(8), 1045- 1068, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1313468
Hampden-Thompson, G., & Bennett, J. (2013). Science teaching and learning activities and students’ engagement in science. International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), 1325–1343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.608093
Hidayah, R. & Lailiy, N. (2018, July 21). Guided Inquiry Model To Promote Science Process Skill Students on Acid-Base.[Paper Presentation] Mathematics, Informatics, Science, and Education International Conference (MISEIC 2018), Advances in Intelligent Systems Research (AISR), 157, 96-97 .Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/miseic-18.2018.23
Hikmawati, H., Kusmiyati, K., & Sutrio, S. (2020). Inquiry learning model to improve student cognitive learning outcomes in temperature and heat. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1). 97-100. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.330.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundation for the 21st century. Science Education, 88, 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
I?nel-Ekici, D. (2017). Ortaokul o?g?rencilerinin bilimsel sorgulama becerileri alg?lar?n? etkileyen fakto?rlerin incelenmesi. [Examining the factors affecting secondary school students' perceptions of scientific inquiry skills]. Kastamonu Eg?itim Dergisi, 25 (2), 497-516. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/302519
Keselman, A. (2003). Supporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of multivariable causality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 898– 921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10115
Korkman, N & Metin, M. (2021). The effect of inquiry-based collaborative learning and inquiry-based online collaborative learning on success and permanent learning of students. Journal of Science Learning, 4(2),151-159. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i2.29038
Kitchenham,B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University Technical Report [Online]. Available: https://www.inf.ufsc.br/~aldo.vw/kitchenham.pdf.
Lee, M. C., & Sulaiman, F. (2018). The effectiveness of practical work on students’ motivation and understanding towards learning physics. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 7(8), 2319-7714. https://www.ijhssi.org/papers/vol7(8)/Version-3/F0708033541.pdf
Linn, M. C., Lee, H.-S., Tinker, R., Husic, F., & Chiu, J. L. (2006). Teaching and Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science. Science, 313(5790), 1049–1050. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131408
Liu, C. C., Wen, C. T., Chang, H. Y., Chang, M. H., Lai, P. H., Fan Chiang, S. H., Yang, C. W., & Hwang, F. K. (2022). Augmenting the effect of virtual labs with “teacher demonstration” and “student critique” instructional designs to scaffold the development of scientific literacy. Instructional Science, 50(2), 303–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09571-4.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
Musfiqon. (2012). Development of learning media and sources. Prestasi Pustakaraya.
Newman, M., Gough, D. (2020). Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application. In: Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K. (eds) Systematic Reviews in Educational Research. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_1
OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/pisa-2018-assessment-and-analytical- framework-b25efab8-en.htm
OECD. (2019).Skills Strategy 2019 Skills to Shape a Better Future: Skills to Shape a Better Future. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/skills/oecd-skills- strategy-2019-9789264313835-en.htm
Ogunkola, B., & Samuel, D. (2011). Science teachers’ and students’ perceived difficult topics in the integrated science curriculum of lower secondary schools in Barbados. World Journal of Education, 1(2), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v1n2p17
Prasetiyo, W.H., Naidu, N. B. M., Tan, B. P & B. Sumardjoko, B. (2021). Digital citizenship trend in educational sphere: A systematic review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(4),192–1201. doi: 10.11591/ijere.v10i4.21767.
Puspitarini, Y. D., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using learning media to increase learning motivation in elementary school. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.426a
Putri, L. A., Permanasari, A., Winarno, N., & Ahmad, N. J. (2021). Enhancing students’ scientific literacy using virtual lab activity with inquiry-based learning. Journal of Science Learning, 2021(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i2.27561
Ramdani, A., & Artayasa, I. P. (2020). Keterampilan berpikir kreatif mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran ipa menggunakan model inkuiri terbuka. [Students' creative thinking skills in science learning use an open inquiry model]. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v8i1.15394
Renken, M. D.,& Nunez, N.(20130. Computer simulations and clear observations do not guarantee conceptual understanding. Learning and Instruction, 23,10-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.08.006
Rodri?guez-Triana, M. J., Prieto, L. P., Dimitriadis, Y., de Jong, T., & Gillet, D. (2021). ADA for IBL: Lessons Learned in Aligning Learning Design and Analytics for Inquiry- Based Learning Orchestration. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(2), 22–50. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2021.7357
Rosmala, A. (2021). Model-model pembelajaran Matematika. Bumi Aksara. https://books.google.com.au/books/about/Model_Model_Pembelajaran_Matemati ka.html?hl=id&id=5xwmEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Sardiman. (2012). Teaching and learning interaction & motivation. Rajawali Pers
Septiani, D., & Susanti, S. (2021). Urgensi Pembelajaran Inkuiri di Abad ke 21: Kajian Literatur. [The Urgency of Inquiry Learning in the 21st Century: Literature Review.] SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v6i1.7784
Steinmayr, R., Dinger, F. C., & Spinath, B. (2012). Motivation as a mediator of social disparities in academic achievement. European Journal of Personality, 26(3), 335– 349. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.842
Suprapto, N. (2020). A systematic review of photovoice as participatory action research strategies. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(3),675–683. doi: 10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20581.
Tamami, F., Rokhmat, J., & Harjono, A. (2022). Validation of Go-Lab Based Inquiry Learning Spaces (ILS) on Science Subject for Junior High School Student. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 1724–1729. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.2174
Thangjai, N. (2022). Developing inquiry learning characteristics of grade 7 students using integrated 5e’s of inquiry-based learning and game-based learning. Journal of Educational Issues, 8(1), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v8i1.19547.
Woods-McConney, A., Oliver, M. C., McConney, A., Maor, D., & Schibeci, R. (2013). Science engagement and literacy: A retrospective analysis for Indigenous and non-Indigenous students in Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9265-y
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Zacharias, Z. C., Olympiou, G., & Papaevripidou, M. (2008). Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students’ conceptual understanding in heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 1021–1035. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20260
Zaini, M. (2018). Development of Guided Inquiry Based Learning Devices To Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Science. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies, 2000, 107–117. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2261027
Zulaichah, S., Sukarmin, S., & Masykuri, M. (2021). Pengembangan modul IPA berbasis inquiry lesson pada materi usaha dan pesawat sederhana untuk meningkatkan kreativitas ilmiah siswa. [Inquiry-based science education module development lesson on work-energy material and simple machines to increase students' scientific creativity]. Edusains, 13(1), 64-72. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v13i1.17389
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rangga Alif Faresta, Rizal M. Suhardi, Mega Safana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
